This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
No, and as soon as you saw the word "diverse", you can predict the rest. The DIE religion credo is very formulaic and well-rehearsed, and you'll see it anywhere the adepts of this particular sect are encountered. It's like "Proletariat of the world, unite!" of DIE. And of course, it does not imply any actual equality (equality is a racist concept anyway) or inclusion for everybody. It implies a hierarchy of oppression (and thus of value, since value is directly proportional to being oppressed) - in which, unfortunately for them, white straight people occupy one of the lowest levels. Well, when you have an hierarchy, somebody has to be at the bottom, right? That's who. Sorry, better luck next time being born.
Taking all this at face value is like reading USSR Communist Party reports in 1980s about how USSR is about to reach communism any day now and comparing it to what happens on the ground. You'd go crazy if you tried to do it genuinely. In fact, you were literally declared crazy (they invented special kind of "schizophrenia" to put dissidents into forced psychiatric care) if you tried to do something like that in public. We're living in much milder environment now - all that'd happen you'd be banned on Twitter and Facebook. But the divergence between religious formula and actual facts is not going anywhere.
Can you understand motivations of monks, fasting for years to achieve religious enlightenment? Then you can understand motivations of people who place themselves at the lowest rung of societal ladder (sometimes in pretend to achieve actual power, sometimes genuinely) to atone for the sins of their ancestors. It's not exactly a new recipe. And it doesn't actually cost them that much - at least in what they can see - and makes them feel very righteous.
More options
Context Copy link