This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I’d be willing to entertain the notion if anyone “convinced that Gorsch is legit” had any background in the hard sciences. Or if we had any sort of evidence of life in space. You find me a JWST image of a spaceship, we have something to talk about. If the head of the astrophysics department at MIT hears what Congress just heard, then okay there’s at least some reason to begin considering the idea. What we actually have at best are weird photos taken by the general public, statements by a few airmen, and a bunch of Congress members who haven’t taken physics since high school.
None of that in my view constitutes either someone qualified to make a judgement about what is or is not alien, or whether or not the data collected is meaningful. And none of the evidence we see is considered even interesting by anyone who is an expert on space.
I’ll say what I said when this little sideshow started. I don’t believe because there’s nothing that makes it plausible. We don’t have any evidence that interstellar travel is remotely possible, we might, maybe, have a highly speculative theory if negative mass and negative energy can exist. We don’t have evidence of life in deep space. We don’t have signals that are unambiguously artificial in origin. We don’t have images of anything artificial in space that we didn’t put up there ourselves. Until we have even one of those things there’s no reason to consider aliens a reasonable hypothesis.
There are people like that (e.g. Jacques Vallee, Eric W. Davis, Hal Puthoff, Jack Sarfatti, to a certain extent Eric Weinstein) but unfortunately they’re all pretty much ‘unhinged’ to the point where it doesn’t really matter. They all believe (besides Weinstein) in things like remote viewing and parapsychological phenomena which would disqualify any materialist from taking what they say seriously prima facie, and coincidentally, all of them besides Weinstein have worked for intelligence services (ONI, CIA, NSA, etc.) before. Weinstein is a bit of a wildcard since he doesn’t believe in things beyond the materialistic paradigm he was taught in, but he also is totally divorced from academia and many people think he’s a crank since he indicates that people like Ed Witten are intelligence operatives and String Theory is a psyop, etc.
More options
Context Copy link
Would you support declassifying the information that was shared in the January briefing that convinced the two lawmakers I cited that Grusch was legit? Then people with a background in the hard sciences could take a look at it (whatever "it" is).
Depends on what gets declassified and why. I’d at minimum want the information looked at by an outsider with a background in the relevant sciences so that we aren’t left with “Marjary Taylor Green sat in a closed session, came out and said Gorsch is telling the truth.” She has no background to let her determine what she’s seeing.
With classified stuff, even if it’s UFO stuff, it might well reveal things of use to other military and spy agencies. In order to study the airman pictures properly, you need a pretty deep understanding of the systems in the aircraft. Which would also be very interesting to China. Giving an astrophysicist clearance is probably safer.
More options
Context Copy link
Depends on why it is kept secret.
If it is coverup of secret weapon/sensor tests by USA military? Then probably better to keep it classified.
Is it an attempt to get Chinese to waste enormous pile of money chasing aliens? Keep it classified if it helps.
I think it's just a lot more mundane than that - the US just over classifies everything as a habit.
Also if a UAP turns out to be some PLA wunderwaffen or technical gremlin, then that's something you really shouldn't publicise. The thing about unexplained phenomena is that you don't know what they are, so better not take the risk.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link