This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
California has outlawed home generators, which means New York will be next, and then the country. So it's darkness for everyone.
Yes, the blue states will be crushed by their contradictions any day now, just as the dialectic predicts.
No, the victims of blue state policies will be crushed, and the perpetrators will profit.
Nybbler is wrong: California has outlawed portable generators, but exempted the $40,000+ full-mansion backup generators like the Obamas have at their estates.
What's the profit in banning generators again?
Lots. Employing regulators and enforcers from your party, using the law to prevent competition from better products, exploiting the pain your policies caused to generate demand for relief and subsidies... Which your party will control and profit from.
That all of this is negative sum wrecking and looting doesn't stop it being extremely profitable for the perpetrators.
Competition? What competition? We're talking about two separate markets here. People with portable generators are never going to buy $40k units.
Same goes for subsidies. To be clear, you are claiming California will subsidize $40k gas generators?
And the perpetrators of this elimination of competition and collapse of sales are... Generator companies? The ones that profit from selling people generators? The ones that will sell almost no generators in California?
https://mil.wa.gov/extreme-weather-grant-program
Cause outages, ban solutions, hire another thousand sociology grads to oversee a grant program for Public Warming Centers serving Multiplicitly Vulnerable Populations.
https://mil.wa.gov/extreme-weather-grant-program
Multiply by a hundred thousand and you have our modern economy run by these people https://www.dvidshub.net/image/7388150/diversity-matters-day-brings-together-military-department-employees-learn-and-reflect
The kind who get excited at the thought of joining "a trend promoted by organizations such as Common Ground to piggyback vulnerability indexes and site data onto HUD-mandated enumeration studies", because it means more grants to study the need to make more power point presentations calling for more grants.
So you've got nothing to back up your claims about competition or subsidies to drive profits? You're equivocating between the alleged grift being to destroy competition (benefiting producers) and to fund political cronyism (benefitting the cronies). Please speak plainly about who is benefitting and how, in particular how cratering demand for generators would increase profits.
As for the grants program you posted, community heating and cooling centers have been a thing for at least 30 years. Even in years without blackouts (and even in California blackouts are rare) there's people who e.g. don't have air conditioners and can't afford to install them. This isn't a result of mismanagement, the poor will always be with you.
If you don't get how leftist "non-profits" make so much profit out of intentionally destructive government policy, there's not much point explaining. Especially when I suspect you actually do know and approve of it.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link