Why 1986?
The Korean Peninsula is rich in resources and difficult to invade.
I think the crucial question in this respect is what does it mean to be cut out for it. After all, the trajectories of Musk and Peterson are by no means universal.
In the new parliament, amending it would be impossible, as die Linke + AfD have more than one third and explicitly reject it.
Is it really impossible to convince either of them to vote for this nonsense in exchange for some otherwise inconsequential symbolic gesture?
Western Christian patriarchy is still around in the sense that we've been eating its seed corn for decades, as it was that successful.
Damn. That didn't even occur to me.
Can you explain what a "joke college" is?
Were it indeed inevitable for COVID to appear, it’s for reasons such as this that I believe it’d have been preferable for it to appear in some smaller, less significant and less influential country somewhere else in Southeast Asia. The country would have been roundly condemned by the UN for not enforcing proper research regulations, mishandling the crisis, not providing sufficient information etc., maybe with sanctions applied etc., it’d not be taboo to discuss what really happened, and everyone’d have long moved on.
Are you sure that isn't a made-up name?
Makes sense.
The American bourgeois has a lower rate of divorce and a significantly lower rate of bastardy than the working-class.
But the reason isn’t that they prioritize religious and family values above all else, or that they see the role of a family man as an end unto itself. It’s that their bourgeois social circle expects them to form stable marriages with children with members of the same social circle or a similar one that partially overlaps it, because it’s one important thing that confers social status and thus contributes to self-actualization eventually. On the other hand, failing to achieve this is a sign of high time preference, which they see as a personal shortcoming.
As far as I’m concerned, I’m willing to concede that in certain narrow social circumstances it’s advisable to move to a small Illinois town if you find work at the local nail factory. But these are indeed narrow.
5 foot 8, 170 pound women are rather rare, aren't they? Also they are rather unlikely to be attracted to the sort of men who follow such advice in the first place. These are just statistical facts.
Also, keep in mind that such a woman very easily becomes a 200 or 220 pound woman after childbirth(s).
As an interesting side note, adultery was and is still an offense in the United States Military. They don't give you 10 lashes or throw you in the brig, but it fucks up your career. That's interesting to me.
Does this always apply when the adulterer is in service in the US armed forces, or only when the spouse is as well?
You can't kill your wife or girlfriend because she cheated on you.
I'd add that, in certain circumstances and in certain jurisdictions, it was technically not penalized until the '70s or so.
animal herding produces even more patriarchal societies
I wonder why that is. (Unironically.)
My bad.
Do you mean merely shunning fat women should be banned?
You might say they wanted to abolish that police.
When the structures of social control break down, such as in failed states like Somalia, we see uncontrolled young men follow their violent instincts, self-organize into warbands, and fight each other.
They've observed exactly the same phenomena among African elephants.
It was actually the US that withdrew from the ABM Treaty in 2001 and the INF Treaty in 2019. Which arms talks are you referring to?
And this female authority has also been eroded by secularization and modernity to an equal degree.
Eugenics as invented by the social progressives of the day was clearly and decidedly involuntary though.
The current rearmament rhetorics are driven by a political desire to capitalize on anti-Trump and pro-Ukraine sentiments, not by any desire to actually increase the ability of Germany or Europe to wage war.
So what if the Americans or the Ukrainians or the Russians call their bluff?
The legitimacy of the IRBO/LIO was fatally undermined by the Kosovo War. What was left of it was then further undermined by the Libyan War. This damage cannot be undone at this point.
True. I can also think of other factors. As far as I know, it has traditionally been normal for elite Western European families to send their sons off to expensive private boys’ boarding schools, where many of them got groomed by older pederasts in positions of authority and subsequently became pederasts themselves. In general, one trait that sets elites apart from the plebs is that they’re relatively isolated in their youths from normal rites of hetero sex. Also, I suspect there’s a strong correlation between the inherent traits that make one an ambitious, unscrupulous member of the elite and the usual traits of pedophiles, which means that kid touchers will always be overrepresented among the elite.
More options
Context Copy link