@Celestial-body-NOS's banner p

Celestial-body-NOS

Why should Man not rebel against Nature, when Nature herself is in rebellion against Justice?

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 00:16:31 UTC

				

User ID: 290

Celestial-body-NOS

Why should Man not rebel against Nature, when Nature herself is in rebellion against Justice?

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 00:16:31 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 290

"Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity."

To which some wiseacre responded "You have a better way of making more virgins?".

He spoke of “building bridges,”

'Pontiff' derives from 'pontifex', Latin for 'bridge-builder'.

"Our world-view is Basic Human Decency/Objectively Correct Reality; therefore, explicitly acknowledging it as true is un-remarkable, while disagreeing with it, or even not explicitly affirming it, is Shoving Your Politics In My Face."

Or when the 'on hold' music is interrupted every minute with a recorded voice so you can't even stop paying attention until someone answers.

the time to build nuclear was 30-40 years ago

The best time was 30-40 years ago. The second best time is now.

the only benefit is just to cover intermittency

"Other than that, Mrs Lincoln, how was the play?"

There's also the land use issue. A 1.21 GW nuclear plant takes up a lot less land than 1.21 GW of solar farms or wind turbines.

there are plenty of alternatives for that as well

Unfortunately, the numbers don't add up for any of them.

make the kosher food as unpalatable and inconvenient as the rest of their offerings

Or, they could make their regular food better.

At some point it becomes more useful to model it as a form of tithing than con artistry. The people buying this junk must be getting some form of utility out of it, even if it confounds the sophisticated mind.

During the 2021 short squeeze of GameStop, some people bought stock not caring whether they came out ahead, considering the entire amount they had spent on it to be a fair price to strike back at the Wall Street investors whom they blamed for 2008. ("It's not about the money; it's about sending a message.")

Someone who feels ill-used by the Very Serious People in establishment politics might very well purchase the items in question thinking not "This has a good chance of being profitable." so much as "You bastards ruined my life and then had the gall to blame me and say I deserved it. F%*# you, I'll give money to the guy you hate."

The act of publishing such a slate has been unfashionable since the early recession (outside of tumblresque enclaves)

And certain front lawns. ("In this house we believe....")

... because the other side called him a doge before they had a cause; if he is a doge, beware his fanges. (wow. very revenge plot. which caskete choose? argument much clever.)

It might [be] too early to celebrate the death of wokeness

If/when the estate of Dr. Seuss returns On Beyond Zebra and McElligott's Pool to print, I will consider wokism to have expired, gone to meet its maker, run down the final curtain, and joined the choir invisible.

Note that Prince Harry is the great-great-great-great-grandson of a Russian Tsar (Nikolai I - Konstantin Nikolayevich - Ol'ga Konstantinovna - Andreas tis Elladas - Philip of Edinburgh - Charles III - Harry of Sussex).

I dislike the continual minimizing/maximizing of windows and the break in flow of thought

I forgot that not everyone here is using a desktop browser. Would footnotes¹ be a better alternative?

linking to a website instead of simply explaining in words what it is you yourself have intended in your post.

OK, I will try to explain it in words. "wow. very revenge plot. which caskete choose? argument much clever." is a description of the plot of The Merchant of Venice in the dialect associated with the 'doge' meme, for which Elon Musk has a particular fondness.

The Merchant of Venice is a play by William Shakespeare, containing the line "Thou calledst me dog before thou hadst a cause. But since I am a dog, beware my fangs.", meaning that Shylock was treated as villainous before he had done anything questionable, and therefore was not incentivised to be forgiving. (Act III, scene 3.) I was alluding to that line in the first part of my comment, in that Mr Musk was also treated as deplorable by the chattering classes prior to having thrown in his lot with the Trump campaign²; the spelling of 'doge' and 'fange' was an allusion to the same meme.

¹Like these.

²A comparison can also be made to the Dazexiang Uprising in late-3rd-century China, in which two officials realised three things:

  1. The then-ruling dynasty imposed the death penalty for being late.

  2. The then-ruling dynasty imposed the death penalty for rebellion.

  3. The roads being impassable due to rain, they had no chance of arriving on time.

It's also performative because most of these ladies are not actually going to swear off men, because they like sex, attention, and validation. Political lesbianism and lesbian separatism largely failed as a movement because women found out that they can't just decide to be not attracted to men, any more than men can just stop wanting women.

This is exactly the same as the MGTOW movement, who are just as much a gang of performative blowhards who'd crawl over broken glass to actually score, but talk a big game online about how they don't need no woman. They don't care. They so don't care. Can you see how loudly and obnoxiously and convincingly they are not caring?

"No one will ever win the battle of the sexes, because there's too much fraternising with the enemy."

chestfeeders

Which is also superfluous! 'Breast' was already gender-neutral once; a suit of armour had a breast-plate, not a 'chest-plate'. The sternum didn't stop being a 'breast-bone' when it was in a male skeleton.

The gendered term was 'teat'; as in, "If you want your baby to grow up strong and healthy, you have to give it plenty t'eat."

Note that in the books we see her in September. Perhaps, being associated with a river, she becomes wider in the spring.

Note that "marg bar _____", while literally translating as "death to _____", is often used as an idiomatic expression of general hostility; compare how N. W. A. were not expressing carnal desire for the local constabulary.

cannot afford to subsidize ventures that are not delivering the promised speeds or are not likely to meet program requirements

failed to demonstrate that it could deliver the promised service

So when are they cutting off the spigot to the cable companies?

Progressives can post just as easily as they used to, they just don't want to do it when non-progressives have the right to respond.

In other words, they were accustomed to privilege, and now equality feels like oppression?

"Latinx: a word used only by gringxs."

Where do you stand on 'Latines' or 'Latinaos'?

Aren’t all Jews technically Israeli citizens?

Eligible for Israeli citizenship. That is not the same thing as being an Israeli citizen.

Otherwise, anyone with a quarter-million in the bank would be considered a citizen of St Kitts and Nevis.

Easter won't occur on March 31st for at least the next 25 years (sorry, my chart only goes to 2049).

Next occurrence is in 2086 (62 years hence).

Violence by armed gangs has fallen 'drastically' since the emergence of a vigilante justice movement

Ah, yes; another one of those irregular verbs.

We're a neighbourhood watch organisation; you're vigilantes; they're a gang.

I have to wonder if Donald Rumsfeld's (I think it was him?) practice during Bush 2 of covering up breasts of statues when he was speaking in front of them had downstream effects I didn't anticipate.

It was John Ashcroft, of the Justice Dept.

"Moderate drinking at 17 damages developing brains" is only relevant if you think everyone was brain-damaged in a relevant way back in the day.

...which is, IMHO, not that far-fetched of a hypothesis.

Feminism as a concrete social movement is about advancing the material and social interests of women (or at least, the interests of a certain subset of women). It's not about "giving people the freedom to explore their identities" or "recognizing the complexity of every human" or any claptrap like that.

Until men or other women disagree with it, whereupon they retreat to "Feminism is simply the radical notion that women are people!" (This is why it is helpful to replace the symbol with the substance; yes, I Am Once Again Asking You To Read The Sequences.)