Dean
Flairless
Variously accused of being a hilarious insufferable reactionary post-modernist fascist neo-conservative neo-liberal conservative classical liberal critical theorist Nazi Zionist imperialist hypernationalist warmongering isolationist Jewish-Polish-Slavic-Anglo race-traitor masculine-feminine bitch-man idiosyncratic party-line Fox News boomer. No one yet has guessed a scholar, or multiple people. Add to our list of pejoratives today!
User ID: 430
Which returns to the point that the data span limit you are quibbling about doesn't actually change whether it supports the point being made- not least because if it did, you'd be raising the data implications under the different boundary, as opposed to fixating on the boundary rather than the data
Complaining that the not-even-arbitrary stopping point of a data set is at a particular part of an event cycle is dumb if the conclusion isn't based on the end point of the data itself. It would only be a meaningful objection of cutting off too early if the subsequent data disproves the thesis- but this is not the claim you have made, and it was not the basis of the claim you are critizing.
The data under the timespan does support his point. The timespan itself does not undercut his point because it does not ommit relevant data that would disprove his point.
More options
Context Copy link