Isomorphic_reasoning
No bio...
User ID: 961
You said both sides were wrong. I don't see how the pregnant lady is anything other than entirely blameless
If we could somehow ensure that the people doing the censoring had correctly learned the lessons of history that other people had failed to learn then this would be great. But ensuring that is about as hard an just ensuring that we all collectively remember those lessons in the first place.
In my experience the conversion rate from “she wants to have sex” to “she wants something serious” is nearly 100%
This is highly variable from person to person. In my experience its only been 10-20% but I think I'm on the low end. I have a really nice body and a rather spotty career history.
This kind of assumes that the only thing that matters is convincing people to switch sides in the short term. This may be valid for elections and highly charged issues but the idea behind steelmanning is that you don't just change a mind, you foster genuine understanding of the nuance of an issue which will help people form more robust opinions and ideas on new issues.
If it's so good that people are convinced, then doesn't that imply it was actually valid?
Is this a serious question? Have you ever met an actual human being? Even the smart ones can be misled by compelling but ultimately flawed arguments and the bottom 95% are absolutely hopeless
I don't think it's beautiful on the outside but I'm sure it's prettty luxurious on the inside. I think it's a pretty big jump to go from "One specific billionaire is not particularly concerned with the outer beauty of his dwelling" to "material possessions aren't important"
humans are confidently wrong all the time
Unlike law, where a majority of cases have at least semi-redacted public documents, medical documents are not available to GPT-4 for training. GPT-4 went from 40th percentile to 88th percentile on the LSAT, by simply adding legal data to the pre-training set.
Um, the LSAT isn't about legal stuff. It's designed to be taken by students before they enter law school. It's just about logical reasoning and interpreting arguements.
It seems as though social contagion is far more prevalent than I realized and trans people don’t actual exists besides a very small subset with actual dna issues.
Trans being a social contagion is not the same as saying trans people "don't actually exist". I think in debates like these we need to choose our words carefully if you want to have any chance of convincing the other tribe.
Do any of these perpetrators have especially bad childhoods or history of being bullied?
I wouldn't expect to know either way. Whether or not someone was bullied isn't usually public knowledge
Is the question "what will they look like if the supreme court bans racial preference?" Or is it "what would they look like if admissions were truly race blind?" I fully expect Harvard will try to skirt the rules even if the supreme court bans it. I think your numbers are are reasonable for the first question. The second question would be at least 40% Asian and not more than 2% black
These things are super sensitive to the exact question wording so it's pretty hard to draw strong conclusions
b) drug users to move to back alleys without affecting the actual rate of drug use.
That's the goal. The goal isn't to stop drug use. It's to make the subways acceptable
First of all, did she say anything about killing?
What do you think the word slaughter means?
Of course the AMC is harder, but this did about as poor as random guessing on the AMC 10. That's much worse than "quantitative IQ 130" level.
Then that suggests that it's GRE score is not an effective measure of its "IQ"
It's inconsistent though. It completely bombed the AMC 10/12
And they're not wrong, an 85 IQ black kid does in fact have a much better chance of becoming an NBA player than a successful mathematician. Of course this will still be the case no matter how many mathematicians you put in front of him for him to look up to.
The lower class pays a negative amount of taxes after accounting for subsidies
I think it's much easier if we don't do anything about current loans but just stop making them bankruptcy proof and federally guaranteed in the future. That won't cause any problems
Being poor, uneducated and not independent is typically a sign of either laziness or low intelligence. Is that considered poor moral character?
Are we suppose to assume, blacks, the youth, poor men, men without degrees, and guys without their own place are inferior romantic partners, and or more misogynisitic than their rich, old, white, college educated, apartment renting counter-parts?
The answer to this is obviously yes. Of course a man who doesn't even have his own place is an inferior romantic partner. Who would want a guy who isn't independent. Are blacks more misogynistic? Almost certainly, anyone who disagrees isn't familiar with black culture. Or for something more concrete look at rates of rape and domestic violence
But keep in mind that in 1971 Carter, then Governor of Georgia "proclaimed ‘American Fighting Men's Day" likely in support of First Lieutenant William L. Calley who had recently been convicted for his role in the Mỹ Lai massacre.
Reading that article it doesn't sound like the day was in support of Calley. It was more to affirm the fact that Calley's actions and character were not representative of the us armed forces in general. That's much less objectionable.
Why would you be friends with such a person?

Exactly. She wasn't agreeable and submissive but that doesn't mean she did anything wrong
More options
Context Copy link