@Nantafiria's banner p
BANNED USER: repeated antagonism and bad behavior

Nantafiria


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 23:01:21 UTC

				

User ID: 246

Banned by: @Amadan

BANNED USER: repeated antagonism and bad behavior

Nantafiria


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 23:01:21 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 246

Banned by: @Amadan

progressives actually did get to use their pets to enact their violence revenge fantasies on their class enemies

We're never getting normal discourse back on this place, are we?

You are, of course, completely correct. Now tell the couple dozen million or so people who are ride-or-die with Donald Trump that they better git gud because foreign working class people are better than they and we might get somewhere interesting.

From the OP:

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

Figure something a pattern all you want, there are people who disagree with you. Calling them names is against the letter and spirit of this thread.

God I seriously wish that some of these anti-car people could just spend a month actually living in the "car free" cities that they think everybody wants so they could realize how terrible it is.

I'm with all the other guys posting down there: lived it, still kinda do, it's pretty neat. What gives?

For what it's worth, I mean that genuinely: how do you square multiple people telling you things are fine with your post insisting it is, in your own words, terrible?

Yes, those millions of children who will mostly attempt to earn their living and keep their heads down are much worse of a scourge than the trajectory Iraq was on since 2003. Clearly.

People aren't fungible. Neighborhoods aren't fungible.

If but NIMBYs acknowledged this, I would have a much easier life. I would have loved to live close to my mother, grandmother, aunt, brothers, nephew, niece, and high school friends - but couldn't, because I'm priced out of living anywhere near them due to vastly risen costs. My brothers now moved far off, too. NIMBYism is exactly why I can't afford to live where I want: the salary that was enough in the 90s is nowhere close to being sufficient today.

Biden is one of the architects of civil asset forfeiture in the first place. There are many reasons why any one person may have voted for him, but criminal justice reform is not going to be at the top of their list.

Sweden is a different nation from the Netherlands, with visibly different policies in lots of ways, different ruling parties, and different people. I'm not really sure why their (alleged - I don't know your friend) situation should reflect on ours at all.

I'm from the Netherlands.

it doesn’t say good things about the degree of mythological significance that event has gained

Why? Societies need some things with mythological significance to be cohesive. Arguing against such a tendency is arguing against something at the very root of human nature. Arguing against this specific narrative.. Well, that just puts you in the same camp as all the other holocaust deniers.

The post that sparked the discussion is about holocaust denial- or 'revision', ha ha. It could equally well be about the periodic discussions on HBD or women or some other choice topics that tend to come up here. If you had views out the mainstream where these are concerned ten years ago, that's fine, but these topics were no less volatile back then and talking about them was no more respectable than it is now. That they keep coming up and keep seeing scores of upvotes had better damn well be reflexive contrarianism, because the alternatives if anything are worse.

Do you think that is YouEssAyyy's actual opinion, yes or no?

What does that have to do with the people of Odessa wanting nothing to do with her today?

Compared to all the doom and gloom that everyone was predicting, the answer rounds down to "no".

Compared to the glorious benefits that were promised, the answer rounds up to "yes". Better to judge policy by its actual effects, rather than by stupid weakmen so easily acquired.

Communists are excepted not because of history, not quite, but because of the present.

Nazis are people nobody really personally knows. Insofar these are people you do know, they're skinhead degenerates and terrible people altogether - again, evil losers. Everything I said applies to Nazis because that's just who they are.

Communists aren't so rare. They appear in your library, you went to school with some, your child goes through a stupid phase, what have you. These people are, mostly, losers.. But not that evil about it. It's tough to be so viscerally hateful of communists when the median commie isn't a skinhead hooligan, but more of a weirdo who thinks society would be great if we'd just, like, learn to share, man.

Crucially, the people most likely to hate and revile communists as much as they do Nazis don't meet any in their regular lives - rural Americans. The median communist is irredeemably evil to them, because nobody close to them would ever think of adhering to such an evil ideology, much as with Nazis and anyone else.

Corruption in Italian politics? Say it ain't so. Nobody could've guessed.

No, but really, do people out there genuinely expect politicians not to be dirty? Insofar I've talked to Italians, this kind of behavior is more norm than exception.

No, and fuck you too.

The Israelis care more about their own security than they do about proving paranoid rightists and anti-colonial leftists wrong, as they well should. If the standards of being a good ally include refusing aid, Israel still isn't a uniquely bad ally. Insisting they don't take the money or else they're big meanies is ludicrous.

That is the narrative paranoid rightists suggest, because 'they betrayed us' has been their playbook since the Dolchstoßlegende. Where Europeans elect rightists more interested in culture than money, they can in fact work against immigration, they do in fact work against immigration, and people who say it never works out aren't looking very closely. Sometimes the left beats them to the punch to take the wind out of their sails. And sometimes, in 4D chess moves that are entirely too funny to me, even the most pro-immigrant nations will take action against immigrants while insisting it's about antisemitism bro trust me bro we surely don't care about the people sucking up benefits. The French are sick of it and in no way get 'the same result'. Eastern European nations where people move away from more than to do it.

There's plenty of anti-immigration policy in Europe to be found, if you care to look. Did you actually care to?

Us ordinary Europeans keep voting for the people who have been doing this for decades. 'Victim blaming' is mostly a fake and gay concept; vote for neolibs, get neolibs. Simple as.

I'm not dense enough to think the people are Vice think everyone should be polyamorous, into swinging, as well as cuckoldry. For what it's worth, I don't think you are either.

The median Vice employee, let alone reader, thinks breaking your wife's (or husband's) trust is bad; no sacred union is required, for nothing is sacred to begin with. If that means you both go into marriage thinking any of these three rightwing boogeymen is okay, then power to them, so says the Vice liberal. If you drop it on someone out of nowhere, cheat on them, betray what was a generic relationship? Not so power to them, shitty move, so says the Vice liberal.

This isn't very complicated. This isn't news to you, either: I shouldn't have to spell it out. I don't know why you'd imply that this isn't obvious if you weren't trying to score tediously cheap points, so if you will, please tell me what the point of this has been. The ranks of Vice aren't full of people who think cheating on your wife is totally awesome, and to twist around so it kinda-sorta might look that way is tiresome. Not clever. Not enlightening. Just tiresome.

Why?

Do you reckon that includes Ashlael and I, or am I correct to assume this is a whole bunch of hot air?

He is sternly told that it is a criminal offense to bring up such arguments.

The Netherlands has laws on the books as-is, and this doesn't happen. So much so that I've seen your precise exact situation play out in university, and the resulting answer not being 'WRONGTHINK BAD' but 'here you go, you can look at these things.'

And any person crossing a road is one drunk driver away from being a corpse. Somehow, people cross roads without being miserable shut-ins.