BANNED USER: /comment/392108
>Unban in 3d 06h 55m
No_one
Underemployed Slav. Likes playing Factorio.
User ID: 1042
Banned by: @netstack
No_one
26d ago
It seems you're right.
Funny how that makes the far-right look actually better, as men who fetishize masculinity and brotherhood(but not homosexuality itself) due to a developmental quirk are somewhat more sympathetic than psychopaths and sexual predators into politics to gain power by exploiting man's egalitarian impulses.
No_one
26d ago
The SA was rightly sidelined by a party that wanted to run a country, which requires more than streetfighters and the vastly more selective SS which replaced it wasn't noticeably gay. So calling the regime itself to have been disproportionately homosexual on the basis of one of its precursors, that got sidelined, is pretty odd and not valid.
No_one
27d ago
Nazis weren't disproportionately gay.
Apart from Roehm, who else was a homosexual?
No_one
27d ago
Between him being Catholic, being pals with homosexuals like Ali Alexander, it seems likely he is a homosexual too.
There's even video of him performing fellatio, isn't there?
No_one
28d ago
German establishment is selected to be submissive due to the influence of lobbying and pressure organisations. Certain prominent media corps (Axel-Springer )officially endorse German submission to American interests.
E.g. check the member list
No_one
28d ago
What's more important - Avoiding starvation in Taiwan or Korea or saving the world from the Chinese menace?
They're gonna convince themselves Chinese will bow down first, no matter that they have a rail connection to like no.2-3 food exporter and world's biggest stockpile program. They convinced themselves Ukrainians will win a war of attrition against a more numerous and better armed foe.
We're well on the way to a million dead, most of them very likely Ukrainian..but nobody is giving a shit. Literally nobody.
The ironic thing is that Western man requires misogyny, because women lack constructive political instincts and need to be sidelined from politics if the polity is to survive.
And we're only getting it from Fuentes, a person so untrustworthy as to be practically utterly useless.
edit after I got the 30 day ban, I thought everyone knew that women weren't selected for being able to cooperate effectively in large groups?
Politics in mankind's very, very long pre-civilized past was typically war or war-related organisation like alliances and as war has always been and still is an exclusive domain of men(e.g. consider which sex has a shoulder adapted for throwing or what's the sex breakdown of war corpses in Ukraine ), from that it follows that men were way more selected for being able to cooperate constructively and effectively for survival purposes and selected for the ability to put away all of their petty feuds and differences in the face of greater threats.
Because in case of military defeat, they were basically dead re: posterity (dead and slaves don't procreate - American black slaves were an exception) and women were generally -outside of nomad cultures- still valuable as slaves or second wives so whatever happened, they were not doomed.
More options
Context Copy link