@No_one's banner p
BANNED USER: /comment/392108
>Unban in 7d 03h 28m

No_one


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 8 users  
joined 2022 September 08 22:22:12 UTC

Underemployed Slav. Likes playing Factorio.

Verified Email

				

User ID: 1042

Banned by: @netstack

BANNED USER: /comment/392108
>Unban in 7d 03h 28m

No_one


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 8 users   joined 2022 September 08 22:22:12 UTC

					

Underemployed Slav. Likes playing Factorio.


					

User ID: 1042

Banned by: @netstack

Verified Email

The ironic thing is that Western man requires misogyny, because women lack constructive political instincts and need to be sidelined from politics if the polity is to survive.

And we're only getting it from Fuentes, a person so untrustworthy as to be practically utterly useless.


edit after I got the 30 day ban, I thought everyone knew that women weren't selected for being able to cooperate effectively in large groups?

Politics in mankind's very, very long pre-civilized past was typically war or war-related organisation like alliances and as war has always been and still is an exclusive domain of men(e.g. consider which sex has a shoulder adapted for throwing or what's the sex breakdown of war corpses in Ukraine ), from that it follows that men were way more selected for being able to cooperate constructively and effectively for survival purposes and selected for the ability to put away all of their petty feuds and differences in the face of greater threats.

Because in case of military defeat, they were basically dead re: posterity (dead and slaves don't procreate - American black slaves were an exception) and women were generally -outside of nomad cultures- still valuable as slaves or second wives so whatever happened, they were not doomed.

It seems you're right.

Funny how that makes the far-right look actually better, as men who fetishize masculinity and brotherhood(but not homosexuality itself) due to a developmental quirk are somewhat more sympathetic than psychopaths and sexual predators into politics to gain power by exploiting man's egalitarian impulses.

The SA was rightly sidelined by a party that wanted to run a country, which requires more than streetfighters and the vastly more selective SS which replaced it wasn't noticeably gay. So calling the regime itself to have been disproportionately homosexual on the basis of one of its precursors, that got sidelined, is pretty odd and not valid.

Nazis weren't disproportionately gay.

Apart from Roehm, who else was a homosexual?

Between him being Catholic, being pals with homosexuals like Ali Alexander, it seems likely he is a homosexual too.

There's even video of him performing fellatio, isn't there?

German establishment is selected to be submissive due to the influence of lobbying and pressure organisations. Certain prominent media corps (Axel-Springer )officially endorse German submission to American interests.

E.g. check the member list

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantik-Br%C3%BCcke

What's more important - Avoiding starvation in Taiwan or Korea or saving the world from the Chinese menace?

They're gonna convince themselves Chinese will bow down first, no matter that they have a rail connection to like no.2-3 food exporter and world's biggest stockpile program. They convinced themselves Ukrainians will win a war of attrition against a more numerous and better armed foe.

We're well on the way to a million dead, most of them very likely Ukrainian..but nobody is giving a shit. Literally nobody.

Do they have some theological carve-out allowing them to form militias, or is the Amish refusal of military service purely about refusing to serve someone else's military?

What is more important - 50,000 old people dying from hunger and economic losses in allied nations, or US maintaining global primacy?

You tell me. I see Americans opine that it's better to burn the world than to lose top dog status. Not all of them, mind you. Maybe there's hope.

Every IT worker I know IRL hates them due to past experience.

Generally incompetent, deflect, don't do their job , needy. Sure there are exceptions but they noted no other foreigners are like that.

Most groups they cooperate with abroad are 20% crap, on Indians are 80% crappy.

Take your troops home like Soviets did, close down your bases, rebuild Nordstream or pay for it, everyone is going to be happy.

It's really simple!

Those scamming datacenters are there bc Chinese cracked down inside China.

Americans counter that in case of Taiwan invasion they're just going to keep sinking and stealing Chinese cargo ships everywhere else and that PLAN is too small to stop them.

They're also talking about allowing privateering again.

Why do you think US would win when a carrier group doesn't have enough interceptors to even get close to China?

Getting into a shootout with a small continent sized landmass isn't what a admiral is looking to do.

They're pacifists. They'd not last.

AI can do that too.

Making it clunky and unpolished is not that hard.

Germany has an official firewall.

2/3rds of the voters are voting against 'right populists'... and those 'right populists' are represented by typically ex-christian democrats. E.g. founder of the AfD was a member of the CDU for 40 years..

So, about half of those strongly against 'right populism' are voting against people they used to vote for, and against positions they used to vote for due to strange elite choices.

Firewalls so hard that one of the most actual effective anti-immigrant parties is leftists?

Denmark is pretty much unique in Europe. It's the single place where social democrats didn't outright sell out their previous base. Germany has a firewall. France has a firewall too. If those two countries came to their senses, it'd be possible to start doing something about the millions of people who were told to leave but didn't leave.

Won't move a real needle on legal immigration.

You sure about that? 5 years back even debating whether H1B is desirable was totally beyond the Overton window. Now it's up for debate. You need to pray that US doesn't get wise, because if it reformed its immigration to be pre-1965 pattern, it could do to Europe what EU did to Bulgaria - drain most of the productive people away,

illegal immigration in and refugee entries in particular has decreased significantly due to measures taken by current EU governments

Look at that chart. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Asylum_applications_-_annual_statistics

Oh yeah, brutal efficiency. They got it back to half a million per year, wonderful. It was at 130k in 2008. They fucked it up and did the bare minimum - stopped fucking it up progressively more because they're all getting scared 'populists' will slaughter them in elections. Wake me up when per capita, EU is deporting as many undesirables as USA. Then I'll admit Trump admin admonishing its vassals about this is baseless.

b) What is this historic break represented by the administration? Crackdown on illegal immigration and putting a pause on some 4th world countries? Won't move a real needle on legal immigration.

Have you awoken from a coma perhaps? 5 years back, USG was all over George Floyd. Today, USG is officially angry at the government of South Africa for its wilful refusal to even pretend to care about the farm murders. Which, sure, aren't wholly ANC's fault but they deliberately made the situation worse.

Insane Civil Rights Act related judicial decisions are getting cancelled by supreme court. DoJ is suing businesses for discriminating against native Americans (by that I mean the sort of people who founded the US, not the tribesmen it conquered and grudgingly made citizens decades later). Overall, very positive and notable changes. Wake me up when EU stops kissing the ass of the 3rd world and starts deporting illegals the way it was done in 19th century - arrested, marched to the border under police guard and ejected.

get lectured for seemingly failing to be democratic and preserving our cultural identities

A) If AfD wasn't facing bans and there weren't firewalls against anti-immigrant parties across most of the continent you could make this point without looking like a left-wing journalist.

B) it's highly disingenuous of you to fail to acknowledge the historic break in attitude to wholesale imports of aliens represented by the Trump administration. Prior to Trump, USG was a huge promoter of moving the 3rd world into the first.

Okay. I'll try.

I don't believe Americans would consider it legitimate or let it go if Chinese-supported popular and quite violent discontent led to a regime change in Canada or Mexico, Dominican Republic and probably any place in the western hemisphere. They don't even consider it legitimate if Chinese win MP seats in Canada with deniable Chinese government support, even though, US itself supports a gigantic amount of deniable political activity around the globe via various means government institutions formed for that express purpose, such as NED, 'private' foundations closely tied to secret services or deep-pocketed sympathetic billionaires with ideas etc). They're otherwise fairly intelligent people, so the inability to see things from the POV of the other side is jarring.

I'll point it out next time without accusing anyone of being autistic.