What seems strange to me with progressives is that after rejecting most Christian values that constituted the backbone of Western civilization, they still hold on to some of them arbitrarily.
'Kinkshaming' is bad, sex work is good, but rape is still some kind of immense evil. Raping a sex worker should be seen as a variant of theft and assault. Raping a promiscuous person some kind of assault, depending on the circumstances.
If it's up to a Christian person not to be offended by porn, drag shows, Pride parades, and all of the other almost inescapable manifestations of progressive values, why can't a feminist put the awkwardness or repulsion of unwanted sex aside?
Women: Your Comfort Is Not Our Problem
As the joke goes, statistically, 9 out of 10 people enjoy gangrape. Rape is not your thing, it does not mean that you have a right to deprieve other people of their fun.
I think I did see some European progressives defending immigrant rapists to the tune of 'they don't know it's wrong, it's their culture', aside from that rape still seem like a big taboo. Another exception seems to be with the topic of transwomen in bathrooms/prisons.
Now that every progressive woman is probably using anti-pregnancy contraptions, the worst outcome of rape seems to be some discomfort, especially if the receiving end does not struggle.
At a time where suggestions are made to abolish police forces or to provide financial reparations, would it be so crazy to include physical reparations to those who have unfairly been deprived of physical affection?
One weird trick. The Messiah conquered the whole world with a simple suggestion: love thy enemies.
How to get rid of Hamas:
There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
That's not true, racism has a very clear definition.
A collection of racist policies that lead to racial inequity that are substantiated by racist ideas
If it quacks like an animal-that-quacks, then obviously it is an animal-that-quacks.
Well the whole government of Israel uses Israeli civilians as their excuse to genocide the Palestinian people yes.
Hamas targeted Israeli civilians this is why we are retaliating against Palestinian civilians
Who knows how many IDF veterans were at that festival as well.
Would festival-goers in Israel be part of the IDF's "tank armor" by that definition?
How would you feel if some government labelled your family "collateral damage in urban combat" after trapping them in their neighborhood, cutting power and water and bombing their housing? Would you be upset or would you consider it fair according to the Geneva rules of war?
Why are women and children considered military threats to the Israeli governments?
A genocide with a warning is no longer a genocide? I guess that's what these Palestinians get for living next to evil terrorists uh.
If killing ~1200 people is a genocide, what is Israel doing to the Palestinians now?
NYC itself is under threat from the open southern border situation:
New York City Will Be Destroyed by Migrant Influx—Eric Adams
Ukraine did not even need foreign help to defend Kiev from Mexicans, yet the US are still pouring billions into the country.
- Is this referring to the fact that Zelensky (and Bibi) are Jews? If so … I don’t think that’s the most relevant fact about the US support of Ukraine
Ukraine was a border province of the USSR 40 years ago, there were some border disputes with their neighbors ~5 years ago, but suddenly they elect a member of the powerful entertainment industry lobby and the border dispute becomes a major conflict.
Both Israel and Ukraine's leaders are mere puppet of the real masters of this world... the shadowy leaders of the secret group sometimes referred to as Hollywood.
Hollywood mogul acknowledges gifts to Netanyahu may have been ‘excessive’
You have some very personal grievances based on your, ah, "lived experiences," and basically you don't want to live around black people, but just saying it like that doesn't sound very nice even to other rightists
Call it uh, Scott Adams-nationalism.
“Based on the current way things are going, the best advice I would give to White people is to get the hell away from Black people,” the 65-year-old author exclaimed. “Just get the (expletive) away. Wherever you have to go, just get away. Because there’s no fixing this. This can’t be fixed.”
If Mexico were to invade the US with tanks and soldiers tomorrow , I am 99.9% sure that the Biden administration wouldn’t say “sorry, we are all tied up in Ukraine and Israel, nothing we can do here”.
There are definitely cartel soldiers sent from Mexico to the US. Hamas doesn't have tanks afaik.
Similarly if Ukraine were to get swathes of uncontrolled economic migration from Belarussia … would anyone in the US government care?
Well once the Mexicans start making up ~70% of a given Ukraine area and they decide to have a referendum and declare themselves autonomous from Ukraine and then start blocking roads and taking tribute (tax) at the new borders, then the federal Ukrainian government decides to bomb them and Mexico decides to intervene to protect innocent civilians, yes the US government does get involved at that point.
b) terrorists killing and abducting citizens of another state
Fentanyl kills almost 100K Americans every year, that's a lot more than a few festival goers.
But "Clark Kent dual-identity" is the fruit of identity politics across the West, and everyone is playing the game.
There are 2 hot wars that the US are engaged in by proxy and none of them have to do with anal sex but both of them have to do with who is in charge of the country they are supporting.
Strangely, when it comes to defending borders, there is this opinion that the Southern US border is not worth defending, but borders of such important countries as Ukraine and Israel are worth billions of dollars (and the blood of millions).
You'd think that ~168 million Americans would be more interested in protecting their own borders but apparently it's the ones with distant relatives in some swamp lands that get to have their borders of choice defended by US taxmoney.
Before 2020, nobody thought that mail-in ballots were per se fraudulent.
Because they don't have to be. Ballots can still be considered relatively secret with the exception of a few %age. When a large share of ballots get mailed in, then the mechanism by which these ballots get collected, who handles them and whether or not people influenced how they are filled becomes a bigger issue.
And nobody on either side of the aisle thought that this was a problem that would justify overturning a close election.
No, one side thought the Russians fixed the elections through Facebook ads or some such nonsense.
He said that he won by a landslide, that there was "massive fraud", that Dominion and Smartmatic voting machines meant that the in person votes were invalid, and that rogue election officials had added large numbers of fake ballots to Biden's tally.
Maybe he got it wrong, doesn't mean that there was no plot to fix the elections.
You mean the pandemic with an impact visible at the macro-demographic level? Or are you telling me that governments outside the US faked 6 million deaths (by official count) or 25 million deaths (based on demographic statistics) in order to allow slightly easier postal voting in a US election?
Governments that are essentially vassals to the US, perhaps. Other governments could also independently find their own reasons to dabble in medical authoritarianism, and join in on the fun using the same existing justifications made-up by the most effective media in the world. "Look I'm not forcing you to stay home to cover up ongoing political issues, see Hollywood has the same problem"
And of course media control made it easy to dismiss outliers like Sweden which did not have any lockdown and was basically fine.
governments outside the US faked 6 million deaths
People all-over the world die all the time. I could see a strong incentive from less-developed countries to claim X number of citizens died 'from Covid' if that means they can get or simply maintain existing humanitarian aid from the West
The pre-2020 conventional wisdom was that easier postal voting helps Republicans (because of the military vote)
There are only so many military votes you can get even if you made postal voting easier. On the other hand 'democracy'-supporting organizations used to hold ballot secrecy as important prior to 2020, so idk why.
so if there had been a large-scale conspiracy to steal the election for Democrats, the main goal of the conspiracy would not have been slightly easier postal voting.
How would they go about it? I'm not in charge of election-fixing for Democrats, so I wouldn't know but it seems you have some experience in their manner of thinking.
Trump is unusually dishonest. Heck, even by the (even lower) standards of greater-NYC real estate operators, Trump was unusually dishonest, this was common knowledge on Wall Street, and was in fact sufficiently common knowledge that a joke about it got into Sex and the City.
Oh man then if Sex and the City said it, it must be true. Out of all the real-estate scammers in the US, Trump is unusually dishonest. He was buying every judge to the point that it took him reaching the Presidency and suggesting defending the Southern border for somebody to finally decide, "that's enough, now we gotta get this unusually dishonest guy!" "Let me find the dirtiest dirt I have on this guy... Yes... This is perfect, the Russian President had some prostitutes pee on him!"
Epstein's buddies like one Donald Trump, who allowed Ghislaine Maxwell to recruit girls at Mar-a-Lago, who was a frequent flyer on the Lolita Express
You have Epstein's flight logs? Why aren't you releasing them then?
who promoted the corrupt prosecutor who gave Epstein a sweetheart deal the first time he got caught?
Oh he promoted him but didn't hire him and was not in charge when the actual ruling happened. But he was in charge at the time Epstein almost saw consequences for his crimes.
If Trump was such a good buddy with Epstein, why are we investigating Trump over some paperwork issues or election quiproquo instead of Epstein? Why not investigate his role in the Covid masquerade?
Show us the flight logs, show us the Pfizer receipts, show us the meeting notes from the FDA, now that would be an interesting investigation.
How did Zionists do it?
Most people nowadays have a non-white friend, family member, partner, or work colleague. White nationalism would mean severing these important relationships. In sum, white nationalism is dead on arrival as a political movement.
They don't have to come. Moreover, if they do have a non-European partner, their children are not going to be Europeans, so that family would not qualify. Typically people in these situations are not interested.
There's perhaps 10% of the population in any given historically-European country that would not see an issue with living among other Europeans. Some of these people will have to move to another area, to regroup.
It would not be unexpected for people living in certain localities with existing policies like "catch and release" for (non-European) murderers to move out to more hospitable locales.
Currently these locales are strictly gatekept by financial means but other options exist and will develop themselves in less authoritarian countries than the West, where freedom of association does not exist.
The more pressure is put on existing mostly-European communities to integrate, the more successful the independence movement can be, until we simply run out of Europeans.
In 50 years, every single European child will be born from a right-wing extremist family by today's standards. Perhaps they will simply integrate into some order-minded, economically-advanced Asian country in the future, before disappearing.
If the facts set out in the Jan 6th committee report are correct, then The 2020 election was not, in fact, fraudulent
Didn't a bunch of states create mail-in-ballot rules that undermine ballot secrecy just for that election in particular before some of them got taken out by courts due to their irregularity?
Wasn't the whole Covid psy-ops leading to these rule changes in the first place?
"We can't have ballot secrecy because there is a horrible disease with a 1% mortality rate for 80 years olds, oh we can still have massive protests against police brutality, but not ballot secrecy, no no"
If there was evidence of a massive conspiracy showing all level of governments and media building up the Covid scare with the ultimate goal to undermine the integrity of the elections, wouldn't that be some kind of coup, or at least conspiracy to commit a coup?
Thanks to the Twitter files we already know that federal employees were pressuring social media companies to erase opinions going against the media consensus on Covid. From the same agency that back in 2015 was building up an investigation against Trump to prevent him from getting elected.
There is a lot of evidence, including from before Trump became a partisan political figure, that he is unusually dishonest by the standards of rich and powerful Americans.
Well yes, of course the average rich and powerful American is a honest guy. Not the kind of guy to end up on Epstein's flight logs. Oh wait, I still can't see them, so I'm gonna have to believe that he is a honest guy and it's pure coincidence that Trump is getting prosecuted and not Epstein's buddies. The judges are just doing their work, nothing to worry about.
Well I don't have teenagers yet so I can't tell whether any of my efforts will bear fruits.
Ideally you would homeschool and keep them in a more traditional environment. It may all be for naught in the end anyway. I don't think it's possible to keep up the efforts without a religious conviction that this is what God intends you to do.
From an individual point-of-view, it may be more beneficial to fully embrace the world and its mores and go where 'Progress' says you should be going without looking back. Embracing 'white boy summer' might catch you syphilis or a fentanyl OD but maybe not.
Tragedy might just as likely strike the god-fearing Christian. Perhaps it will be easier for them to recover thanks to the virtues imbued in them by the tradition, but they may still end up in objectively worse circumstances, from a strictly worldly perspective.
Feminism should not be an issue to the modern godless man. They just need to learn to play it like an Andrew Tate or a Trump. The moral rejection of the sexual revolution and its consequences can only be downstream of religion, not whatever ideology is currently wearing the skin of Christian civilization.
We also have to examine whether he's facing more prosecutions because he happens to commit more crimes. You can't examine the world with selective blindfolds and expect to arrive at the truth.
Out of all the people committing crimes, the US legal system chooses to expend so much effort on Trump. The one President that has not started any war and has actually tried to downsize the war effort.
The one President whose foreign policy actually seems like it was made by an America-minded person. Not somebody working for the military industrial complex, foreign lobbies...
One thing I would not mind Trump being investigated for would be his involvement in the Covid masquerade.
Go ahead, investigate the Trump admin's role in the Pfizer vaccine development, advertisement and distribution. As long as it's not just Trump but every other little cog in that huge machine that took over America for 3+ years.
So many interesting things that could be investigated from torture and other war crimes [in the Middle-East], to Epstein, military-industrial complex influence, Big Pharma corruption, lobbies pressuring government to pressure social media to censor, human and fentanyl trafficking at the Southern border and beyond...
This is your average US politician, but somehow Trump is a vicious criminal that must be stopped now, or something
it bears mentioning that Trump is absolutely being treated with kid gloves on by the system.
How many former US Presidents have been subjected to the same level of prosecution?
Convert to Christianity and learn to love your enemies.
It's just the parts where men are responsible for everything.
As they have always been. Now it's up to men to let women fall hard. Find a good woman, have many children and teach every single one of them not to be promiscuous. Tell your sons to beware of promiscuous women, the general atmosphere of city life and so on.
Feminists will either have 0 or few children that they will have trouble raising on their own or with cowardly, weak feminist men.
You don't need to do anything to give these women their just reward, they will find it on their own.
Israel isn’t going to change its ethnat policies because some Norwegian politician cries on TV about Gaza
I don't care about Israel. Sure it's sad if some Israelis die brutally but it's not really my problem.
It does matter when my local government asks me to send money to Israel to fight their problems on their behalf.
If they could get over their hatred of Jews, they’d realize that amplifying Israeli rhetoric about savage barbarians etc would be far more likely to turn European populations against mass immigration (“it could happen here soon enough”).
We already did the 'fight Middle-East wars on behalf of Israel' gig and all that's got us is migrants, terrorist attacks, and more authoritarian governments suppressing right-wing political expression.
Plenty of Western leaders have called foreigners 'savages' but all that's got them is to be labelled some variation of 'nazi' aided by the media-intelligence-NGO apparatus, to be banned from media or to be criminally prosecuted.
Don't you wish you had an American President ready to label Palestine a 'shithole' country?
The only way for Western countries to stop the migrant flow is for Westerners to stop letting them in and have hard, authoritarian measures against foreigners and pro-natives. If the same people crying about Hamas right now would have stopped crying about Trump, nazis, fascism, Charlottesville, Jan 6, AfD, Golden Dawn... Maybe I'd care. Now all I can say is #OpenBordersforIsrael
I can't take the faux outrage
Today the shoe is on the other foot. After years of crying over Trump 'fascistic' takeover, 'migrants in cage', the cruelty of not taking every single African that shows up at the border etc, etc, we are now being told by the same journalists that 'actually genocide is good m'kay' when it's jews doing it.
I can't take the faux outrage the remaining rest of the time when it's not jews doing the hecking racism, and the current attitudes by the respected members of the media is a demonstration that it was always faux outrage.
Given the chance, he'd push the button for mass deportations of non-White Europeans and racial segregation, not to mention what he thinks of Jews.
Who would not? All people like Keith want is the sovereignty to behave like Israelis do in their sovereign nation, or even not as cruelly as they do.

Another facet of this morality problem of the modern-Westerners-in-Christian-skinsuit is regarding children. If you do not care whether your children grow up to stay chaste then enter Christian-opposite-sex-marriage-for-life, then...
Surely if a child is old enough to make important social decisions about their sexual identity, or taking artificial hormones, why would they not be old enough to engage in sexual practices?
Why would it be immoral for you to make your child available to adults that may want to engage in sexual practices with them, or initiate them to sexual practices, like the government is doing with sex education? Why are they offended about being labelled a groomer? They should be able to proudly reclaim the g-word like sex workers the w-word and rappers the n-word.
Aside from this extreme example related to children, why do progressives sometimes complain about age gaps in relationships? Isn't dating an older man empowering? It's ageplay, it's domination, it's a kink, why do they shame?
More options
Context Copy link