@adjective-noun-number's banner p
BANNED USER: perfomative belligerence and declaring no desire to follow rules

adjective-noun-number


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 April 16 09:06:32 UTC

				

User ID: 2341

Banned by: @Amadan

BANNED USER: perfomative belligerence and declaring no desire to follow rules

adjective-noun-number


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 April 16 09:06:32 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2341

Banned by: @Amadan

I really like how several people have already explained to you that the game controller is one of the sanest parts of the debacle, but you continue to treat it as a slam dunk.

This is not what doctors do. The other 10% of the time they get it confidently wrong and prescribe you an incorrect course of treatment.

do you really think elites all walk around with a view that they are better than all others, and the peasants can just die if they're useless?

Yes.jpg

Maybe it works differently in your country or for globalist elites, but this is exactly what elites in my life explicitly say.

Love the veiled threat. The right to eat meat is without doubt worth dying for, but against people on soylent diet it's more likely to be “killing for.”

Why do the elites keep the rest of us around? Net positive contribution to the economy and fear for their lives. AGI negates both of those reason. And, as a pithy right winger phrase goes, “You are the carbon they want to reduce.” If the things continue on the current trajectory, I expect human population to be reduced millionfold by the end of the century. To be maximally cringeworthy, I propose imagining how the backstory of To The Stars would have went if there had been no magical girls in the setting.

This is only tangentially related, but just today I watched this year's instalment of John Wick, and the episode's smug asshole discharged how he doesn't believe in second chances, because those are for the men who fail. The obvious to me rejoinder is that if you select for men who never fail, over a long enough timeline you will end up with people who never do anything at all. And looking at our real world, what outside of the digital realm has been done in half a century?

And yet men are perfectly happy with ordinary non-hyperstimulating women, in a stark contrast with the preferences of your sex to whom only relative desirability matters. As always, the world is ending, women most affected.

There was always a contingent of women into anime and they're into the cosplay scene a bit

It's just finding their niche as a large fish in a small foul fond. The quality of the men simping over them is abysmal, but the sheer quantity per one woman does translate into a quality of its own. I don't think I've ever seen female enjoyment of a hobby disentangled from social and status reasons.

For any men: Duluth Model. Crap, now that I think about it, I'm not even sure it's called that because it originated in the city. That was low effort and generally un-Motte of me, I apologize.

Just be a +1000SD genius, bro, it's that easy. I find the approach of using Hawking and Dinklage as examples somewhat counterproductive. Those two successful (I'll take your word for it) marriages, how long ago did they start, by the way?

I need to reassess the net contribution I bring to hair salons, as I never go to the same one twice in a row.

The globe is too small for any of us not to live in the US, as evidenced by you and me posting here.

How curious that yours is the only reply. Anyway, what is so unbelievable about leopards progressively eating every face save one?

Yes, literally one man or maybe one man and his family existing is also a scenario I find plausible. And however epsilon is the incentive to make everybody else extinct, it will always be greater than the negative incentive to keep them alive.

P.S.: in my likeliest scenario you personally are quite plausibly among those that are left, so I don't think taking anything you say at face value would do me any good.

I actually can't. I have no rent or mortgage and I provably can survive on ramen and cheap vodka. I'm against travel on ideological grounds. Entertainment can be pirated. Any other I'm missing?

Ok, you got me there, no amount of status I can achieve without breaking into the upper strata, which requires more politics than straightforward work, with that being something we all motte autists are ill-equipped for. You in particular should know the importance of the right location of a summer house.

There are two things I miss from Reddit here: comment counts on collapsed threads, and autogenerated throwaway names.

If my memory isn't playing tricks on me and it was indeed @2rafa who wrote it, then there was a post in /r/PurplePillDebate that has stuck in that memory for literally years, with such a genuine confusion about how habitually covering the check could possible be an issue that only somebody both upper class and female could have written it.

I want to give them half credit, my reaction to seeing a trans-identifying male is not unlike that to seeing a spider. There are also rational parts to opposing them too, while spiders are beneficial, but there certainly is some similarity in the instinctive response.

That was not a precise number. The idea is that those who possess capital will be able to instantiate AGI and control productive output and meaningful means of violence, and those who don't possess — won't be able. The mechanism will be locking out the have nots out of the economic system entirely, giving meager hand outs until the pretext (genuinely believed! Human psyche is useful like that) to wipe them out is presented. And cimarafa is a daughter of a billionaire? Multimillionaire? Somebody who will be able to claim a share of the ownership of the post-scarcity abundance in any case.

The only thing I, and I guess most other posters from outside the US, know about Duluth doesn't make it sound a good city to live in while male.

The book I'm currently into has a fictional cryptocurrency with a so-called “feedback problem” with its algorithm: it's viable to create sockpuppets and bounce transactions between them to ramp up your reputation. The resident math genius diagnoses that the protocol must be redesigned, because the problem is isomorphic with the Collatz conjecture. I can't imagine a way how it could be, but I have only a surface math knowledge and am only familiar with the conjecture from its Wikipedia article and a 4chan shitpost. Is there a plausible design where the two are similar? Or is it just used a piece of technobabble?

A nice work otherwise, judging from half of a book of a trilogy. Could possibly be a modernized Atlas Shrugged without the monologues.

A two square meter sleeping pad and nutrient sludge for billions of proles is energy and matter that are uselessly diverted from achieving the goals of people with the private keys to the AGIs.

If it's the plane out of a gathering, I found the way I want to go out.

I've seen no evidence anyone is actually trying to kill her.

I have to say, back when his trial was going on, I was convinced that Rittenhouse would not live to see the 2025 inauguration. It still might happen, but I'm pleasantly surprised that my prediction seems to be miscalibrated. Scratch that, I forgot accelerationism for a second, I'm unpleasantly surprised.