ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
No bio...
User ID: 626
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
1d ago
Again, I am coming at this from the perspective that asking someone trying to work among Muslims to answer a question like this in public is hostile behavior.
For a given (very expansive) definition of "hostile", sure. The problem is that no one, and I mean absolutely no one, is under any obligation to be non-"hostile" to others. This sort of behavior is completely normal. Media, including public media, do it all the goddamn time.
He was in effect demanding that a woman he'd never met paint a target on her head.
And as for "deranged" - where I think it tips over into derangement is the fact that he specifically did this to a woman volunteering to fight Muslim domestic abuse,
The only people who are being offensive or deranged in this situation are the ones that would target the woman. Under no circumstances is the person asking the question describable as such.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
1d ago
What's baffling about it? Most European elites are on board for the same program. Particularly when it comes to free speech, they definitely do not see the UK as an aberration.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
1d ago
That’s why it’s foolish to present UK policy in a screed against the EU.
But the fine in question is EU policy? The bit about Scotland and Starmer was an aside at most?
The consumers of Russian gas are probably not steretypical Brussels bureaucrats
Did he say they're literally tanking their cars at Lukoil gas stations? The point is that they made the decisions that resulted in the EU buying lots of Russian gas/oil (part of why that chart you linked doesn't give the full story is that it's laundered through India, and other countries). This might be a necessity at the moment, but it's entirely a self-inflicted wound.
the safetyists in government are not upset about fining Twitter; the people who are upset are largely separate from the Musk haters.
Yes, the safetyists aren't upset at the fines, the safetyists want to fine Musk. That's the criticism.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
1d ago
strikes me as exactly a case of what I assume dr_analog meant by cases that are "offensive to the point of derangement" such that, even if you don't approve of the laws, it's hard to feel too bad for this particular victim
That's insane. "Offensive to the point of derangement" means insulting and harassing people, not "being mean-spirited" or "not actually being concerned about religiously-motivated domestic abuse", if this was the actual standard, you'd probably have to arrest the entirety of the BBC, possible the whole of the UK government.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
1d ago
It was a genuine question. Not everyone has the time to exhaustively get to the bottom of every culture war claim.
Didn't you say that you actually looked into several of them, specifically related to the UK and free speech?
Who? I think you’ll find that the subjects in each of these sentences are actually different people with different incentives.
Every institution has different decision-makers in it, with various incentives, it's still completely normal to talk about the decision made by the institution as a whole.
For example, did you know that neither Scotland nor the UK are actually in the EU?
And? The EU is still importing Russian oil, pushing safetyism, and driving out investment. The only axis where they're not-quite-so-bad as the UK is freedom of speech, and it's probably just a question of waiting a few years. And the fine in question is actually being levied by the EU anyway.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
1d ago
I'm sorry how is that a counterexample to anything we've posted so far?
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
1d ago
To what extent is this applied fairly in England? E.g. if someone posts "death to the Jews" or "English people should all die in a fire," do they get Big Brother knocking on their door?
What do you think? They're still dragging their heels about the rape gang fiasco, you think they'd do anything approaching fairness regarding Muslim shitposting?
Where do you see these claims, specifically, and what have you looked into?
We recently discussed the case of Graham Linehan, though my favorite example is some blokes getting arrested for arrenging trans flags to look like a swastika. The UK in particular is documentably so bad, that at this point the burden of proof is on you to show that they are being reasonable.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
2d ago
I guess I'm not sure we're much of a compound organism anymore.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
2d ago
Deterrence doesn't work if your threat was already carried out before you even made it.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
2d ago
A position like "more smart prosocial immigrants, but fewer stupid violent ones" will be ejected by the former camp because the "fewer" part just diluted and muddles immigrants-good sentiment; likewise, the latter camp will eject it for the "more" part having the same effect on immigrants-bad sentiment
Executive function doesn't enter into it. The issue is that the two tribes have no reason to trust each other, and that there are too many people with the "accept compromise, but keep fighting" mentality, so the only rational strategy is to swing the status quo as extremely to your side as possible (even beyond what you might actually want), and then fortify it as best as you can.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
2d ago
This might be true in the sense that there might have been a lot old shacks that have fallen into disrepair, but if something was well-built, it wasn't ugly by design the way things are now. Even 16th century social housing projects are reasonable to look at.
I still think the problem of 'how to get good immigrants' is easier than 'how do we fix our industrial policy' or 'how do we make our people have more kids'.
I don't think there's enough good immigrants to go between Europe, the US, Japan, Korea, and if China ever joins that club, you can forget about it. I'm also pretty sure that deindustrialization and depopulation are deliberate policy, rather than innocent bumbling around by the bureaucrats.
Could be. Happened with Trump 2016, Brexit and Modi 2014.
Nothing quite so drastic, but an educated urbanite won't be caught dead sharing no-no opinions in public, so even their relatively low numbers just won't become apparent in conversation. Though funnily enough it might come up with parents fretting over the political opinions of their kids, their sons in particular.
I really don’t think there’s an equivalent on the right. The idea is preserving order through continuity, in principle.
Eh, there's plenty of people, even semi-organized groups, that share the fears of being genocided and that fantasize about the Boogaloo, there were even lone wolves that actually killed people. What you don't get is the sort of "no one is in favor of political assasinations, Chud, but teehee isn't it great that someone rid us of that turbulent priest" reactions that you could see on the left.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
3d ago
Europeans are proud. Trump has taken a sneer-and-condescend approach towards European politics. It's a bad strategy towards any institution. But, it's catastrophic towards Europe. I visit Europe every couple of months. Yes, urban educated circles aren't a representative sample.
"Aren't representative" isn't even the half of it. Educated urban circles aren't even representative of educated urban circles, anyone with 2 braincells to rub together is in full Havel's Greengrocer mode, and the ones that do actually side with the regime are having palpitation over populist parties getting more and more mainstream.
They need immigrants.
Any country that bothered publishing statistics on the subject showed that non-European immigrants cost more money than they bring. The whole idea of solving our financial issue with them was ridiculous from the start.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
3d ago
What exactly were you expecting, given the marking scheme for this assignment? Why are you still looking for ways to shit on the student, now that it's abundantly clear the issue is with this professor / this university / the absolute state of academia in general?
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
4d ago
It would, if the top of the class isn't what it used to be, no?
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
4d ago
It can't be the first time, or any time, because it just doesn't fit the criteria for being an instance of the general case you claim it fits into.
Where did anyone argue against increasing standards? Where did anyone even show that the discussed case was an attempt at increasing standards to begin with?
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
4d ago
It is not college-level writing.
It isn't, or it shouldn't be?
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
4d ago
Do you disagree that "both parties are unarmed and in an enclosed space" is the modal practical scenario where any martial arts training actually makes a difference?
If we're talking men vs. women, yeah. Ages ago (possibly before moving offsite) someone posted a compilation of "girlfriend shocked at the strength differential between her and her boyfriend" Reddit threads, where silly playflighting games somehow gave the girls the idea that they're roughly equal to their boyfriends, and their world suddenly shattered when for some reason or another the boyfriend picked them up like a kitten. Technique can be important, but it's just not going to be a factor in a fight between average man and an average woman. Your 50th percentile woman (after training) vs 80th percentile man strikes me as extremely unrealistic.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
4d ago
Say what you will about psychology, but if I submitted an essay based on Biblical inerrancy to a geology class, I would justifiably expect a low score.
If psychology was like geology, anyone bringing up the concept of gender would have to be treated as harshly as anyone bringing up God's grand design as an argument (note: there's nothing in her essay about Biblical inerrancy).
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
6d ago
Ran into another one of those "package covers 99% of my use cases, but god dammit wouldn't it be nice to have that 1%" situations. Not a big deal, but all workaround feel a bit ugly. Otherwise still trying to figure out if unifying local and external api views makes sense.
How have you been doing @Southkraut?
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
7d ago
It's not meant to answer them. All they're doing is asking OP to give some time to the best pro-trans argument, which in their estimation is transmedicalism.
You can dispute that trans-med is representative of the average trans person, and say that the Queer Theory wing of the trans movement has most of the power and influence. Hell, you can even question the validity of the diagnosis itself like I do, but I don't see how you can say they conflated any of the claims you listed with the main claim they actually made.
Alright, the local / API views are unified, made some fixes to the to the UI... looks like I'm past the point I was pre-nuking of my project (and yes, this time I have backups). Now the only thing left is some sort of an import / migration script from the old version. The refactoring was significant enough that this is essentially v2, and over time I managed to accumulate quite a library of Tweets, which I don't want to just drop.
How have you been doing @Southkraut?
More options
Context Copy link