@badnewsbandit's banner p

badnewsbandit

lol 🦂 lmao

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 08 20:36:59 UTC

				

User ID: 1038

badnewsbandit

lol 🦂 lmao

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 08 20:36:59 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1038

Isn't John Brown about on the level of a militia commander during the Yugoslav Wars?

It will be interesting to see the societal effects of the soon coming shortage of low dose amphetamines in the population given how widespread their usage.

Autoimmune is a description of a mechanism, not the description of the cause. Saying that a person's immune system attacked their vital organs does not explain why the thing happened. Holding society at large accountable would certainly be novel.

Yeah, messed that up using the comma separator as a bad indexing point.

To which Korea is that most applicable you think?

Why can’t I field a battalion of tanks?

You can. What's stopping you?

wanting a stock Viper is not part of the Second Amendment

Given the historical tradition of private ships and cannon, what excludes a zero down, 25% APY Viper loaded up with some cute girls for a weekend? Not financially prudent but that's not constitutionally relevant.

Just last week there was the police killing/monastery shootout. And the completely unrelated armor, artillery and mechanized border deployment that undeployed for reasons unrelated to international condemnation. Last year was the fight over license plates. Still standing though.

They have around 4x the population of Ukraine, for Russia to run out of manpower before Ukraine they would need to have a more than 4:1 loss ratio. I don't think even the Ukrainians are claiming that and they're been claiming absolutely absurd things the whole time.

The Ukrainian government has not generally reported losses but in December 2022 estimated 13k lost. Meanwhile the UK MoD figure for Russian casualty estimates from December 1st 2022 was 89k. If you were to accept their claims then by those loss ratios they could. Which isn't to say the claims are close to accurate but that it is not more absurd if taking those absurd claims as true to believe (or that they could claim) that they would win by attrition.

To supply Ukraine. A lot of the material transfer is older equipment (with higher maintenance costs) or retired equipment which is being paid for at "prices" that are more closely correlated with the cost of replacing old equipment with newer equipment than the actual market value of the old equipment. A fun accounting trick along the lines of a taxi company selling off every pre-2010, 100,000+ mile vehicle not currently on the road but rather sitting in the back lot (but still having regular storage maintenance) in case of a sudden surge in demand for something like a major event, to demolition derby company at prices that let the taxi company effectively buy the same number of brand new from the factory vehicles which get three years maintenance coverage handled by the factory, have much higher MPG and general QoL improvements.

Aside from feeding the machine, there is also literal feeding to consider. The difference between food imports, strategic reserves and indigenous calorie production between the US and China is a very similar picture as to the oil import/reserve/local production capability differences with the US having much greater food security compared to China.

Pretty sure it's Egypt that makes that decision not Israel. Aside from the occasional boat oopsie.

WoW specifically and post-WoW influenced MMOs I was referring to the deep lore, the legacy of steel.

MPAA R ratings are not going to be a winning move for that target demo. Very heavily implied alcohol abuse is not uncommon for certain stock character types.

Costs and benefits to whom? Why are the benefits to a homeowner who has a long term vested interest in their community (going to bridge) who will bear the costs of increased traffic something you think should be valued lower than a business (are they even property owners or non-permanent tenants?) catering to the kind of people who don't care enough to participate in local politics (or even non-residents). As a general rule, low level politics are dominated by people who care and people who show up.

The suggestion that "Aussies" in general drink XXXX is as offensive as the idea that "Americans" in general shoot varmints out of the back of moving pickup trucks.

Why do you consider pest control an offensive stereotype? Owning property and maintaining it seems rather positive and aspirational.

High or little charity, Mombasa is rather far away from Joburg.

Don't pick bad object level arguments when trying to argue a broader point. Accepting "wrong on the details but correct on the overall" is how you get the "this hate crime may have been a hoax but it draws attention to the important problems" kind of statements. Those are rejected here for the same reasons.

TI4 is generally better as a game but doesn't have quite the same road map. I'm more familiar with TI3 and have the full set of expansions. The Fall of the Empire scenario specifically is a variant with a playable Lazax faction starting with control of Mecatol Rex with a surplus of military power, reduced political power and the objective card win conditions shape the play pretty close to the lore. You can jump from Rex to TI4 but it is slightly less clean of a lore integration. The scenario cannot be replicated in TI4 without significant homebrew because of how dependent it is on the combination of treaty mechanics, the Lazax faction tuning and the objective cards.

The scenario itself is a very natural follow-up to Rex which is the Dune board game rules with various factions fighting on the ground to control Mecatol Rex while instead of the storm from Dune it has a fleet moving around bombarding locations. The mechanics, lore, diplomatic backstabbing and approachability of Rex (compared to Dune or TI proper but definitely still a barrier) seem like an easier sell the TI itself. I haven't played the Galeforce 9 Dune version and while the Avalon Hill one is well loved it has known issues and takes a long time. Rex from my perspective was a better game for the time, matches the TI lore theming pretty well for a barely modified reskin that mostly streamlines some mechanics (made the physical board actually being usable, still not a fan even of the GF9 version but then again Rex's board while usable is very bland) and can be played with fewer players and makes it shorter by an hour or so.

In both Rex and TI3: Fall of the Empire the Lazax naturally fall into a position where you can have an experienced player handling their more complex, initially overpowered position (offset by actual win conditions) acting as a sort of DM playing the BBEG on the board.

Maybe try luring them in with Rex for a slightly simplified version of Dune with the Twilight Imperium IP on top. Then you can entice them into a TI3:Shards of the Throne game using the Fall of the Empire scenario.

Who took over from the German Hanovers who took over from the Dutch Orange-Nassaus...

The whole Windsor thing makes sense in agnatic terms but given that the grandmother of Europe ruled in her own right, it doesn't quite follow in Theseusian terms that her issue are from a different legacy.

That ability to cycle them is also tied up in immigration proper, not naturalization though. The number of overstayed visas is often used to discredit border-based controls in the US but without the ability to similarly enforce visa rules you won't have that sort of churn in the non-citizen population that stabilizes your gulf example.

Every once in a while, I'll take a look through the transcripts from the tribunals/interrogations to fact check an anecdote about the war and they're not quite the best at clearly establishing what happened either. Lots of inference, jumping back and forth between various incidents or to previous statements abruptly trying to catch out inconsistencies, try to get an admission then (at least in transcript form) quickly moving on to the next thing. And for many things testimony is the only thing that survived the chaos and destruction of war. For the ones I remember off-hand the textbook summary was generally in line with what was established in the transcripts but that establishment wasn't necessarily clear, reasonable or detail rich even if ultimately convincing.

Who's more foolish, the fool or the fools who clap for him?

Didn't batman do essentially the same thing?