@badnewsbandit's banner p

badnewsbandit

lol 🦂 lmao

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 08 20:36:59 UTC

				

User ID: 1038

badnewsbandit

lol 🦂 lmao

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 08 20:36:59 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1038

I would just point out addressing the accessibility of performance and tuneability that there are very accessible 3s 0-60, 160mph+ factory vehicles for sub 20k USD. Super impractical as daily drivers if only because of things like snow and rain as well as nearly zero cargo space with very high injury and fatality rates from a complete lack of safety features, but they are still out there. Just not on four wheels. The smaller size and weight makes them more accessible for silly things like engine swaps (outside of dropping a performance motor in a clapped out old enduro/dirt it's a rarity though) and performance mods (though for various geometry and space reasons you can't exactly bolt on a turbo) but there is a bit less of that compared to car culture.

The classic example would be the old 10,000USD deposit at a bank triggering a reporting requirement, those reports focusing attention and investigation into one's finances and also slowing things on the customers end. Depositing 5,000USD and then later depositing 5,000USD does not trigger those reports and sometime between 1970 and 1986 there may have been common advice to do just that for convenience's sake. Of course, specifically depositing money in that way with the intent to avoid that sort of detection is now a federal felony. Often times many of the detection algorithms that have to be run by people end up as straight forward rules of if-this then-that so avoiding triggering detection in the common case might not be that difficult.

But way too many people in the US treat filing taxes as some arcane process they could never understand, when the truth is they've just been deceived by the hype.

They type of person who plays D&D might be slightly more capable than the median person when it comes to navigating a paperwork process or cross-referencing data. Many folks even ones who by all indication should be able to handle certain types of mental tasks when confronted with a problem shutdown and refuse to process to the point that someone else literally reading an error message to them but because the information channel is not from a stubborn impersonal piece of paper or computer lets them move forward. It's like the quote in Dune about learning to learn being something of a superpower for time sensing space Jesus.

Interstates are categorically different from other road projects. They are major freight arteries and are partially federally funded because they are inter-state highways. I-94 connects Billings to Bismarck to Fargo to Minneapolis. US-87 that you're talking about in Texas and New Mexico is still a US numbered highway and that section specifically is the main route off of I-25 from Colorado (and Wyoming) into Texas through Raton, NM rather than routing through Oklahoma. Interstates need to be thought of like freight railroads that commuters occasionally drive on (like how Amtrak sometimes runs on freight rail and by sometimes I mean they are a minority of traffic on those rails, the rails are almost all freight owned) rather than as just "roads" and especially not "rural roads".

When was the last time you tried to access twitter dot com without an account or while logged out? More than three tweets on screen from a feed results in the interaction blocking log-in nag that cannot be dismissed. Single tweets that you are linked to are not as locked down but the same applies to a directly linked TikTok video.

There is something of FUD campaign going on with AI art property rights based on the idea of the model and model produced works being derivative from the works they were trained on. You've probably seen some of the comments reason along those lines in earlier threads here. Of course with IP rights, buying a right from someone who may themselves not have that right does not fully protect the purchaser, but that aspect is less well advertised so it may still seem worthwhile to purchase a license from a known entity.

Regarding the sealift situation, things might be less optimistic for Taiwan on that front than previously thought. https://warontherocks.com/2022/10/mind-the-gap-part-2-the-cross-strait-potential-of-chinas-civilian-shipping-has-grown/

That'd be news to all the Sailors and Marines marrying Filipinas and Thais.

A principled libertarian probably wouldn't support the government mandated service provider monopoly/duopoly that creates the conflict in the first place either. One that accepts the public utility infrastructure principle applied to last mile (libertarians here, not anarchists) would probably want something like local loop unbundling rather than strict net neutrality. But regulating common infrastructure such that it cannot discriminate between private parties isn't heterodox within that philosophical framework. Right libertarians would typically favor auctioning services while left libertarians would favor a common carrier equal service regulation.

It seems in line with how people treat trade dress. The underlying justification was to prevent customer confusion where someone buys a product they did not intend because the branding was so similar. That has been expanded into the look-and-feel standard in the digital age. It's not that far of a logical leap to apply that to a case of training an AI on a specific artist. Take a test case of a programmer with no art skills training an AI on a particular artist they like to produce an app or a game and profiting off the similarity and you've got a precedent for that sort of thing. I don't think that's the correct way to handle things but I can see something like that happening.

I'm actually interested to see how the mirror question of this will affect Russian population. Between white collar flight at the outbreak (see our own «» enthusiast), depending on whose numbers you use casualty rates approaching that 10% of population mark (US estimate 120k, UN population at 144mn) with a similar though not quite as bad population pyramid as the rest of the developed world, how Russia as country of Russians will come out of this win or lose will be interesting and likely different from before.

Funny that the other Korea is doing the same thing for the other side of the equation.

Outside of hyper contractualist ancapistan where things like rights to a view are priced, sold and bundled as contracts and liens attached to properties, the local council being the community consensus decision making group for balancing overlapping property interests seems reasonable. Local governments can be wildly corrupt and not follow their own rules (see #barnlaw) but the principle is quite sane.

Your after image shows less streetside parking and the streetcar delete in favor of a bike lane and enlarged tree lined sidewalks (one is near triple width of the before, other is only double width).

And what's more British than fighting the Nazis, really?

You don't mean to imply that the House of Saxe-Coburg and GothaWindsor isn't British do you?

There is a 3d2a guy working on electronically primed polymer cased ammo. Very much a hobby project on a shoestring budget. One of the NGSW program entries used polymer ammo but the army went with Sig (to go with their Sig pistols and Sig LPVOs), you can buy polycased 308 ammo right now. The other area people go to for impractical is barrel rifling which at this point is mostly solved with electrochemical machining, at least for the lengths of things like the FGC which are designed around zero access to firearms parts regimes.

The IG post about Lee is pretty consistent with how other people with public profiles have their suicides reported to the public. Want to make a wager?

It's probably colored by things like center-left and left media calling the Obama administration scandal free in 2017 and 2015 respectively. Keeping in mind that Anwar al-Awlaki was 2011, the wedding drone strike was 2013 and the ATF Gunwalking was uncovered in 2014.

I've seen jokes floating arounds social media that people have been doing that informally in their phone contact lists. Rather than using proper names people will end up as <Firstname> <Job/Company/Association> in other folks contact lists (ex: "Joel Plumber", "John Google", "Jane ThePub"). Now those contact list entries are not typically shared around but I could see a near future social reputation network where unique IDs include some sort of coalesced version of that information people use to shorthand people they know.

To be fair, sometimes the UK misses the mark so badly that they can get all of South East Asia and East Asia to agree it's wrong even if none of them would agree on what is right.

Why is that a problem? What do differential outcomes have to do with the racism and collectivism your OP was concerned with?

wanting a stock Viper is not part of the Second Amendment

Given the historical tradition of private ships and cannon, what excludes a zero down, 25% APY Viper loaded up with some cute girls for a weekend? Not financially prudent but that's not constitutionally relevant.

And his record was clean before the DVRO?

As far the record exists in the case yes. Notionally he should have been disarmed when the DVRO was issued. The practical application of that would require the court/police to be aware of existing firearms (the person asking for the order might be aware, the person accused is not exactly incentivized to bring up their ownership) and then proactively disarm (expensive, dangerous) rather than simply ordering it be done. Keeping in mind that the DVRO was under state court and the possession is a federal offence. In some jurisdictions compliance can also be done by storing firearms at a club/FFL rather than having to sell off/surrender them to the police so even verifying compliance with the order has friction.

It shall be unlawful for any person[] who is subject to a court order that[:] (A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had an opportunity to participate; (B) restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child; and (C)(i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child; or (ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury . . . to . . . possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition . . . .

As for acquiring, the only thing stopping a 4473 from going through after the order is in effect is if the court that issued the order is tied into the state background check system or the national one to catch someone lying on question 21.i or the person under the restraining order answering that question truthfully. (All of question 21 on that form is basically an IQ check or cya documentation used to prosecute if you lie on it and then publicly admit to doing things that conflict with your answers on that form as in the recent case of a rather famous failson.) And of course it's entirely possible to acquire a firearm without a 4473 and in those circumstances the ability to verify that someone is not restricted is rather limited.

To get around that second problem some states have made it illegal to transfer a firearm without a 4473. And the way they enforce that has been... catching someone after the fact with incontrovertible proof they violated that law. That proof being rather difficult because most of those universal background check states still have various exemptions for gifts/inheritance/loans to avoid awkward things like having to stop at an FFL to let your friend "possess" your firearm during a day at the range. Yesterday's reasonable exception is today's loophole.

They have around 4x the population of Ukraine, for Russia to run out of manpower before Ukraine they would need to have a more than 4:1 loss ratio. I don't think even the Ukrainians are claiming that and they're been claiming absolutely absurd things the whole time.

The Ukrainian government has not generally reported losses but in December 2022 estimated 13k lost. Meanwhile the UK MoD figure for Russian casualty estimates from December 1st 2022 was 89k. If you were to accept their claims then by those loss ratios they could. Which isn't to say the claims are close to accurate but that it is not more absurd if taking those absurd claims as true to believe (or that they could claim) that they would win by attrition.

Passive level dependent hearing protection is an actual thing, primarily to attenuate impulse rather than constant noise which is what NRR measures. There's an Army Research Lab study on several products and the supposedly defective 3M product still beats the rest.