@dr_analog's banner p

dr_analog

top 1% of underdog fetishists

4 followers   follows 1 user  
joined 2022 September 05 14:10:31 UTC
Verified Email

				

User ID: 583

dr_analog

top 1% of underdog fetishists

4 followers   follows 1 user   joined 2022 September 05 14:10:31 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 583

Verified Email

PLEASE try lowering the temperature, Dems.

I agree, but let us also remember to pin some blame on Trump for doing the ICE raids as flamboyantly as possible.

Obama deported 410,000 people in 2012 and managed to avoid cameras far better.

I am convinced Trump wants liberals to overreact because it's the best campaign ad and the mobs are happy to take the bait.

So if you're my roommate and you're hiding from ICE and they show up at the door and I answer I can simply tell them to go fuck themselves and there's nothing they can do about it.

What Judge Dugan is alleged to have done is basically this, so... seems like she's in the clear.

Kind of surprised a federal judge signed off on her arrest.

I don't follow. You believe Congress isn't allowed to decide violations of law are no longer violations of the law?

I love the insinuation that intel agencies are behind the leak of his sex vids. Are you so fucking edgy a journalist that Mossad used 0-day cyber arms to hack sex vids out of your possession somehow to embarrass you? Jokes on them, I have nothing to be embarrassed about, because my sex vids are πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯

Please don't watch though, this is a violation of my privacy. My private hot gay sex, that is. Because I bring the truth so hard.

I get your conflict theory view on law.

I don't understand this part though

You accepted violation of the law to allow illegal immigrants in. On what grounds do you appeal to the law now?

Where have I accepted violation of the law to allow illegal immigrants in?

Framing citizenship as a "reward" is completely nonsensical.

Indeed, if citizenship is a reward why aren't we going full evolutionary humanism instead of focusing on crude bloodline?

There are like poor eighth generation Appalachians who lust for Marxism that are social dead weight compared to the most skilled and industrious red white and blue immigrants eager to come in and deepen our capital and gleefully celebrate Christmas.

Ok well one of us is drinking Kool Aid. Good day.

The problem with your comment is it's flippant and unserious. NATO attempts to establish no-fly zone over Ukraine and then Russia nukes Ukraine and maybe be few airbases where the planes were being stationed in Eastern European

Then we use conventional weaponry to obliterate all of their power projection capability and they become a pariah even the rest of BRICS can no longer tolerate for having used nuclear weapons in a war of conquest.

And even in that case it still does not logically follow to choose nuclear armageddon (escalating nuclear weapons use).

I do wish I was, and my impression is that most of you would be happy to have me.

Yes.

Are you single? Have you considered a sham marriage to an American woman (or man)? I've seen that work fairly well.

I've been informed by LLMs that, despite how biblically popular it is, that teenage women are still physically immature and giving birth is higher risk as well.

See also other underclass issues raised separately in replies.

I actually think it is the opposite. President is there to lead and communicate policies of his team toward the public. If his staff members are the writers, president is the actor or comedian delivering the lines and bits. Presidents are supposed to debate, they represent their administration while giving State of the Union, they should represent the state behind closed doors meetings with other world leaders, they should inspire in times of need and be the face of the administration and above all else they should provide legitimacy for the government they represent as they are the person that people get to vote as opposed to their PR managers or analysts.

That's a fair point. If Biden was a much better orator and could speak non-stop about Israel, Ukraine, and opposing China and denying them semiconductors, he might be able to better persuade the public about the importance of these causes. Strategists have expressed regular frustration that the economic indicators are really good under Biden's administration but the public hasn't heard any messaging about this.

Although his State of the Union performance looked good, didn't it? I mean, he didn't seem like a tired corpse.

This take that person of POTUS is just unimportant position and that a corpse remotely controlled by unnamed staffers could do as good of a job, and that people really should just vote opaque party machinery and believe in the best is absolutely surreal to me. If the politicians can no longer be bothered to even pretend that they care, the legitimacy of the power is gone. It is incredibly dangerous direction imho.

I don't think he's a corpse with no agency. I think he still has judgment and isn't insane and can act like a reasonable person that's aligned with Americans. It seems like he tires easily and is probably tedious to keep up with and you have you have to remind him to stop going off on tangents. Doesn't look good, and we deserve better, but I don't think it means Trump is therefore the answer.

Wait what. If you don't think due process was already dispensed with in the first batch of people who were deported directly to a foreign prison without judicial review I'm not sure what continuing to exchange information here will accomplish.

We don't need nuclear weapons to open a can of whup ass on Russia. We can use our conventional forces for that and the gloves will be off if they use nukes in a war of conquest.

And even if we obliterate all of their power projection capability, it's still better for them to just take that and not choose suicide by nuking us directly.

The only reason we need to use nukes is to guarantee Armageddon if they nuke us.

I can only pitty the fools that still do preorders, can someone explain to me what consumers get out of them?

My guess is the bulk of gamers have limited means and a "better spend my money on things I like while I have it now" mentality. They might not have the money on or after release day. The option to pay for it in advance is the perk, a wise investment in future happiness.

Remember, your company didn't take on any downside risk.

They took the risk of training them only to have them leave, actually.

In large part, USA life expectancy is dragged down by non-trivial amount of blacks. If you compare Japanese Americans lifespans vs Japanese in Japan, the latter have it shorter despite "better healthcare".

I guess I know what I'm spending some ChatGPT o1 credits on.

But no, you're illegitimate. I'd be willing to fast-track you through the immigration system, but you'd have to go back first

I appreciate the endorsement.

Oh, I was born to two citizen parents. Citizenship is mine by blood.

Well! My blood claim is probably as solid as yours is, maybe even moreso.

You're just a citizen and I am not in your framework by legal technicality.

IMO it sounds like you only like law when it supports your POV.

EDIT: I also find the nExT admiNiStrAtIoN / white genocide argument a bit funny because it was Reagan that granted my extended family amnesty and they're all white and hardcore Trump voters.

I could imagine 20 years from now where an increasing share of international business is done in Chinese rather than English, I guess.

It's not a huge win, just possibly more useful than Spanish.

IMO that's still missing the point. They were excited about it and tried to do it and found out it was awkward and disturbing rather than exciting. Like the same panel and the next several:

"I can't feel anything"

"This was much hotter when it was only in my imagination"

"Hey Z... let's try something else"

In thought balloons: "But now that I've had sex a few times I'm not sure I really need any more. Trying to get off in front of someone is kind of weird."

"I think when I do orgasm, it's not because of my body but in spite of it"

They were clearly acting out roles assigned to them by others and by media. If anything it was saying "putting on a strap-on and sucking it isn't what being queer is about"

To me this is practically anti-erotica. It's like reading about asexual people describing PIV sex as rubbing their elbows together.

It’s about a kid growing up not feeling feminine, struggling to fit into pre-built sexual and gender roles, experimenting, and ultimately realizing she's asexual and nonbinary.

It's definitionally unsexy as a whole.

The in-built wifi on my MSI Pro B650 motherboard sucks donkey dick. My phones and laptop pick up great signal in my bedroom, this thing barely wanted to connect. Fortunately, the router is some kind of 5g contraption, and I just moved it closer and kept the living room door proper open. I went from no stable connection to several hundred mbps down, which is good enough. Problem solved for now.

You may want to consider one of those wall modules that have ethernet ports on them that you can plug into an electrical outlet, and uses the mains as a bridge. That's what I would do to get at a router far away from my desktop PC in a rental apartment.

Sure, though whether or not it's a good idea depends on what the goals of the invader are, no?

Russia has engaged in a series of expansionist salami-slicing tactics like this. Giving in just seems to embolden them.

No, the US and European air forces would suffer catastrophic casualties if they tried to do something like this, so Russia would call their bluff and it wouldn't happen.

I'm fairly skeptical Russia has a meaningful response to NATO air power but we can call me a Kool Aid drinker if you like.

Oh? Nuclear Armageddon where hundreds of millions die is unlikely? Okay, well I guess let's just push it.

It doesn't really logically follow that supposing the West surrenders substantial territory and the war can end, it's not enough and Russia is going to push the big red button and now everyone dies. That is the opposite of improving Russia's security posture!

After all, we desperate need land on Russia's border in the NATO alliance because... well who cares, Russia has to make the substantive case why we shouldn't!

As has been demonstrated, countries that aren't part of NATO get invaded by Russia and there's that whole substantive case of the rules based order where you don't get to just conquer nations because it would totes help quiet your paranoia.

EU migration policy seems to be a Soros creation, where he ran an influence ops on the baboons in Brussels.

The what?