greyenlightenment
investments: META/FBL, TSLA, TQQQ, TECL, MSFT ...
User ID: 68
or even more derangedly, blames the USA.
would this be happening had Trump not attacked Iran in the first place ?
this was not some change of heart or a legal obstacle: it simply polled poorly and would be unfavorable among independents. had it polled better i am sure trump would have signed off on it.
yeah but the sort of person who is diligent enough to get into an ivy would presumably like the high surface area of success of the consulting job
oh nevermind i misread that as a 1.33x bench-press
yeah as long as there is a gap, the universities serve a purpose. the college dropout rate still stands at 50% and many still take 5-6 years of a "4 year degree "suggesting it has not necessarily gotten easier. I think this "lowering standards at universities" is much more anecdotal. There are certain standards that degree-awarding colleges must follow.
I think they are both true. his book is right but at the same time employers derive value from degrees.
nice job on the bench press.
how is your blood pressure so low? mine was at 140 even at 180. congrats on weight loss . CICO is technically true in that sense that obesity reflects an energy imbalance, but also limited in the sense it's hard to predict how the "CO" variable will change.
this is a good point:
In 2025, a normal life makes you fat. It shouldn't take an extraordinary life to avoid being fat. And, for most of human history, it didn't. Sometime in the last few decades, something changed such that ordinary levels of exercise and satiety and willpower simply aren't enough anymore to avoid being fat. Since most people do not have the slack to redesign their entire lives around being thin, a realistic solution to the obesity epidemic needs to involve either identifying and removing the orange soda or inventing some kind of orange soda antidote. Telling people to just consume less calories than they spend is a useless distraction, like telling an adult who counts on his finger to just study harder for the AP Calc exam.
at least 75% of the US population is overweight through no effort. something is wrong. it's more than just "eating too much," as there is evidence people consumed similar or greater calorie counts hundred+ years ago without becoming as overweight. historically, when food was cut off during war or other famine , people rapidly starved to death , even on 1500 kcal/day like in Holland or Russia, yet we have entire Reddit subs where people cannot lose weight on 1200-1500 kcal/day (obviously, miscounting calories is an issue).
This sounds like a task for AI. I am sure someone has done a data analysis on this
Sor a second I thought this was Rutgers
Universities love to say they "teach you how to learn". In my mind, this is cope. There is no indication that they are making an effort to do this, nor that it is even possible.
Regardless of their purpose , whatever it is, employers sure want it.
agree. employers get so many applicants. they need some way to filter at scale.
The expansion of credentials has been a disaster. Most credentials are useless, and in fact most outside of highly technical degrees are almost an anti-intellectual signal. The degrees do not, generally, require any serious rigor, no real achievement, and therefore are mostly ways for the schools to admit more dummies to study things that don’t matter in an environment where failure is almost impossible. Comedy should not be a stand alone area of concentration in a college. Very few humanities programs have serious rigor, and even those that do serve no useful purpose.
They serve a function from the perspective of employers in corelating well with baseline proficiency . There is a huge gap in writing skills and other signifiers of ability of 4-year grads, even for humanities degrees, vs high school grads. Screening for degrees saves employers time and boosts productivity without having to interview everyone. This could also mean improved customer satisfaction from having smarter and more competent employees.
actually legit smart comedian
stand-up comedy, yes, but written comedy selects for strong verbal IQ
American comedy is more meritocratic, so where are all the Ivy-educated high IQ comedians? The high IQ and the Ivy graduate would both outperform Shane Gillis on a verbal iq test. So why is Shane the comedian du jour and not those ranked above him in either g or accreditation? Harvard Lampoon alone poops out 120 super-elites per decade, who are ahead of Shane in IQ, accreditation, training, and support. So… where are they?
high IQ people with strong verbal skills and ivy league degrees would choose the safer and more profitable bet of lawyer or consultant
yeah his approval ratting is 33%, which is higher than zero. Nominally, there are a lot of people who do like him. It also helps that the dems run the worst possible candidates.
I see the GOP as continuing Trumpism, as clearly it is winning formula as shown in 2024 and 2016.
maybe he took a bullet because he also saw an opportunity to profit more by being president? These are not necesailty mutually exclusive.
Trump will remain the most powerful politician in America likely until the day he dies.
Agree, even if you don't like trump, there is no evidence to suggest mental decline. he's the same now as he was in 2015: the same bombast , rhetoric, and rambling speech and wall-of-text posts . Someone with actual dementia would not be able to write those long, mostly grammatically correct posts so frequently.
Yeah I predicted shortly after the war began this would continue until after the 2028 election. The Gulf War was an outlier of Middle East conflicts resolving quickly. Iran wants Republicans to lose. And NATO was not going to help either, as they don't feel any inclination to help dig trump out of the hole he created. To profit from this I bet "no on Strait or Hurmuz traffic returning to normal." So far this has been right and extremely profitable. All Iran has to do is just wait for Trump 's successor, presumably Vance, to lose. So far this is working as evidenced by falling approval ratings.
Clarity Act not passed either. Trump and the GOP overall has never been that good or determined at getting legislation through unless it's minor stuff or tax cuts. This is why the dems win long term because they actually put the work in changing institutions, which far outlast executive orders or strong words.
A comedian tried something new, it had mixed results, more news at 11.
pretty much. SNL achieved its goal of getting people to talk about it.
There are many branches of discourse to swing off from here. Did Shane’s norm violation go too far in the eyes of some women, thereby evoking their ire? Did some women misinterpret of Shane’s monologue, though filled with abundantly placating self-deprecation? Or perhaps it was clipped and they didn’t see the full monologue? Is there reduced social trust and affiliation between the genders? Has the dating crisis gotten so bad that a woman wearing lingerie underwear at the gym approaches the untouchably sacred? Was Shane’s humor better off in the company of only other dudes? Are women just not very funny (this is no laughing matter)?
I think you're overthinking it. It was his use of the slur "whore" that pissed people off. had he just said "going to the gym is like Instagram or OnlyFans in real life" no one would have cared. It would have still been funny.

it was more like he would slap a high tariff and then back down , either giving some ultimatum or reducing the duty. The "taco trade" was buying the dip whenever he initially slapped a tariff in anticipation of him backtracking or extending a deadline, which he always did.
More options
Context Copy link