site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 8, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

9
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Did you do any spot checking to make sure known incidents were included? I saw claims that the ADL dataset didn't include a trans shooter at a Christian school under leftwing violence despite that incident being included in their timeframe

Good chance it shouldn't even be included, Westman shot up his own school and thus the likelihood it's some sort of personal grievance or other non political motive/fascination with violence like the large majority of school shooters rather than political is really high. Especially with possible O9A connections

Unless we say that anything a trans person does, even if it's for the same exact reasons that a non trans person does something, becomes inherently political just by their identity but that seems silly.

If a tranny shooting up a catholic school isn't leftwing violence then neither is a white guy shooting up a black church, and we both know that would be included.

If a tranny shooting up a catholic school isn't leftwing violence

Their own school, which means they could have done it for generic school shooting reasons like 99.9% of school shooters

neither is a white guy shooting up a black church,

If a white guy has a long history of attending that church and could have been targeting it for generic shooter reasons targeting their own spaces, then yes it would not count.

Their own school, which means they could have done it for generic school shooting reasons like 99.9% of school shooters

People choose their targets for a reason and politics can be part of that reason. This extends to mental illness. The recent stabbing incident is a good example. He likely had racial delusions as part of the impetus for violence.

If you tell homeless people who are suffering that white people are why they are suffering it will cause some problems.

Guy may have had different delusions including non-violent or less violent ones instead.

My intuition is that O9A stuff looks left wing to those on the right (Satanism is often coded as left wing due to the anti-theistic libertarian strains) while it also looks right wing to those on the left due to being Neo-Nazi. Truth is no one wants it on their side, which should count for something.

O9A are mostly just a bunch of psychopath chaos loving edgelords who call themselves whatever will piss off the most people while they spread child porn and encourage kids to shoot up their schools.