This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
2014-Era Neckbeard Shaming is BACK
"These Guys are Just Weird" is the new ad from pro-Kamala super PAC Won't Pac Down. You really do have to watch it to viscerally understand the impact. I am not gifted enough with words to give it justice. It's not clear if this ad will ever air on tv (seems a bit racy for that), but the internet is where modern elections are won or lost.
As grossly offensive as I find the ad, I cannot deny being impressed. Just a few days ago I pointed out that Democrats need better messaging if they want to persuade voters. This kind of appeal to base instinct is exactly what wins elections. The ethos of "when they go low, we go high," sure sounds good at dinner parties, but it likely cost Dems the 2016 election. In some sense, I truly think they were afraid of the sheer effectiveness of Willie Horton. It took Trump to scare them enough to pull out the stops.
I got a much more effective message in my texts just yesterday.
This arrived. It is obviously illegal, as it has no attribution or "paid for" sign off. Among my family: my wife and I immediately said false flag. "Holiness of pregnancy and childbirth" is a little over the top for public messaging, and people who think a woman shouldn't run for president don't need to be told not to vote for the woman for president. But it's restrained enough in its parody that my parents, boomer Republicans, both thought it was real. My dad said this would cost her votes, because there really are men who think like that. And my lib friends wanted to argue it was real, though their heart wasn't in it. My tradcon friends agreed it was fake, but also, couldn't help themselves from saying something about how there's nothing wrong with the holiness of pregnancy and childbirth, couldn't hold it back.
It's a good effort. They were brave enough to put the Willie Brown picture in there, they didn't just use the Montel Williams photos, they put something genuinely damaging in their fake. But then they push it just a liiiiiiiiitle too far.
If this is connected with the Kamala campaign, then I have to update my assumptions about their ability level. They could win this thing if they manage to sockpuppet these attacks against their candidate until Republicans are being asked about it. Top tier shithousery.
I hate to be the guy, but… are we looking at foreign interference? Particularly since as you say it would be illegal for a US PAC.
No, US PACs just coordinate with campaigns illegally; the Podesta docs talked about that sort of coordination a lot, though no one really cared.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link