site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 10, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

23
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I had a weird moment last night of, perhaps, perceiving my own bubble. So I have to ask to verify...

Does anyone actually believe Biden is the president? I don't mean in an election integrity sense. I mean, does anyone actually believe he is the one steering the federal government or making decisions? I could whole heartedly believe Obama was the Commander in Chief. I had zero doubt George W Bush was in command of the highest Executive Office. Sure, Trump seemed to be at war with his own staff half the time, but he ostensibly tried to exercise the power of his office.

Biden seems like he just gets wheeled out to mumble some words of a teleprompter about once a month. He gets 8/10 of them correct, adlibs something he shouldn't have, and then his handlers come out the next day and "correct" his statements. It just strains my imagination to think he is in charge of crafting policy or executive decisions at all.

Then again, I have heard commentary that he's a bit of a control freak, and wants to have final say in every decision, which is why his administration basically floundered for the first year and a half. He refused to delegate and was a major bottleneck. Supposedly reporters covering him over the years, on various campaign trails, have seen this sort of behavior first hand.

So I donno, am I operating somewhere out on the fringes with this notion? Is there anybody here who fully believes Biden is every bit the President in full possession of the authority of his office that Obama or George Bush (either) were? Can you tell me why?

So I donno, am I operating somewhere out on the fringes with this notion? Is there anybody here who fully believes Biden is every bit the President in full possession of the authority of his office that Obama or George Bush (either) were? Can you tell me why?

I think it's a little more nuanced than a dichotomy between "Biden is President Grandpa, and his handlers give him a warm glass of milk and his pills and send him off to bed before the real meeting" and "Biden is dictator and gets whatever he wants whenever he wants it (within the confines of the imperial presidency)." Most presidents exist somewhere between those two.

There were tons of doubts that Dubya was in charge. See here for pre 9/11 and [here for in the twilight of the Bush years)(https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/opinion/04sat1.html). Obama was thwarted in many of his personal goals by "the generals" or by his elders in the government over and over. And we don't ever need to get into Trump, whose lack of fluency in bureaucrat cost the country a lot of initiatives that could have been great.

So in all cases the president has limited ability to give orders and have them perfectly obeyed. It is likely that Biden has the ability to prevent any major policy that he opposed, but he can't get all the details right any more than presidents before him could, and he probably couldn't deal with a mutiny from employees/democrats more broadly.

I do think there are reasons to believe Biden exercises less power than his predecessors, but marginally not completely. His general mediocrity across a long career, his vulnerability to being overshadowed by his old boss opposing his policies in a way reminiscent of Taft, his age, his party's precarious hold on relevancy.

But the same things were said about Dubya, that he was controlled by Cheney and a coterie of former advisors to his father, and you now in retrospect cite him as a very powerful president. So either that's less true than was common wisdom at the time, or it's not really that important historically.

I remember an old book by John Stossel, from the Bush Jr. era, and he made the point that the President is not the one steering the ship called America, it's the people who do so.