This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I know you hate that argument so I very specifically didn't make it this time.
Based off your historical unwillingness to update your understanding of anesthesia compensation and work duties I don't think we are going to have a fruitful discussion on the doctor skills/role and work alternatives side of things.
By the way, and I truly am sorry if you’ve gotten that impression, I have a great deal of respect for doctors. I think you do a great job, and I think you should be well-paid for it. And and, I think doctors’ pay is only one part of the issue with the US system’s immense inefficiencies, of which a great deal can be laid at the feet of Congress, insurance companies (not out of ‘evil’ or even the profit motive, but just because of the perverse regulatory and incentive environment they’ve been out in), the way big pharma is funded and to some extent the tragedy of the commons.
My only real ‘thought’ on doctor pay is that we should have more doctors. Let’s train them, let’s import them (from native english-speaking countries with decent standards, like our peers in the anglosphere), let’s do whatever it takes to increase residency spaces. And let’s make residency easier, let’s limit medical liability to bring down the ridiculous cost of malpractice insurance, let’s make medicine an undergraduate course like it is elsewhere so doctors don’t have to waste four years and more money going into debt.
But yes, ultimately, let’s work to bring down some salary costs. Is that so unreasonable?
Do these people want to come? I'm not sure they do.
Usually when this conversation comes up what happens is that I say something like "sure increase supply just don't compromise quality" and then someone says "being a doctor is easy, there aren't really quality differences or problems" I recall this argument from you in the past but if you don't endorse it now no problem, but ultimately most supply increasing options involve compromising quality in some way. Americans are mostly uninterested in decreasing quality, but if we decide that's on the table then we have a lot more tools available to solve some of these problems without touching supply at all.
Also, right now we seem to be in a situation where shortages are pronounced enough that the market can absorb a much higher number of physicians without bringing salaries down. In fact we likely need to increase salaries (specifically: one of the biggest problems right now is that people will refuse to work in red states or rural areas, these jobs already offer higher salaries, sometimes as much as twice as much, but in some cases that's not enough).
We already have some evidence that salaries are too low for some needs, taking salaries down further is liable to make those issues first (and again does little to decrease the overall healthcare costs).
From the UK? I assure you they do.
Why don't they then?
I wasn't able to find a good single source of truth but medical students can do it (which Scott did(ish)) if they are interested. It's harder than it would be a for a U.S. grad but likely much much easier than an Indian medical school grad.
The BMA website implies that some "adult" (saying it this way because I can never remember the British terms) doctors may be able to come over without any specific retraining but does not provide details.
Training is probably somewhat worse in the UK but not enough that I'd have any complaints about anyone coming over (although this would obviously be bad for the UK).
The one I'm married to wanted to in 2014/15. She passed the USMLE had her ECFMG certificate, recent clinical experience in a western European native English speaking country and didn't require visa sponsorship as the spouse of a US citizen, applied to a variety of programs and failed to match, not even any interviews. ☹️
I appreciate the N!
Most of the countries that seem to match into residency in the US seem to have pretty well developed infrastructure to help explain what to do, outside of that its hard to know what locations are programs are realistic. It's a brutal process even for US MD grads.
:/
She may want to try again. Any advice on trying following a ~10 year career break?
I'm not sure it is possible in the sense that I believe the USMLE scores become invalid after a certain period of time (somewhere in the 5-10 year range?). Would need to investigate that and potentially move quickly.
I don't know if you can take them again if they've expired but it would be extremely hard most likely (on just the studying level if nothing else).
If they are still valid though - NYC almost always has a bunch of unmatched FM and IM spots. That's probably the best place to look. EM has been off and on grossly uncompetitive in the last five years but it hasn't been consistent. Psych used to be a place people looked but it doesn't really work anymore. Peds may have more spots open now.
HCA and other for-profit places have started offering program slots and they aren't popular with US grads but could be a good spot for FMG/IMGs
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link