site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  2yr ago (text post)   36939 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 24, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

20
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I am not a medical doctor. For all I know, Fetterman will make a full recovery, eventually.

My understanding of strokes, through some limited personal contacts, is that once the damage is done there is very little that can be undone. Successful recovery is measured in terms of activities of daily living from relearning/learning anew with different parts of the brain, not getting back to one's old self. It's literal brain cell death which is why so much of the medical emphasis is on identifying a stroke happening and quickly responding to reduce how many brain cells die from lack of blood flow.

Am neurologist, on iPad at work and don’t want to log in via their Wi-Fi for obvious reasons. Typing is laborious so going to type in shorthand. Technically right but missing tons of data. Too much info missing to give full prognosis but I think he’d do fine based on public info.

Stroke in his case = clot in brain vessel. He had a thrombectomy so he had the clot removed by an interventionalist. No idea how much brain tissue was permanently irreversibly injured. Could be pretty minimal based on the limited videos I saw.

Because they did thrombectomy, we know it was a large vessel. If a large vessel clot completes, he’d have a facial droop and right arm plegia in addition to a LOT more language issues. He seems down to a mild brocas aphasia. Brocas ranges from mute to stumbling words. He’s already on the pretty mild side of a brocas.

If I saw him in clinic, prognosis for recovery would be great. Could have some persisting deficits. A lot would depend on the extent of injury that we don’t know. I’d say the most important factor is already-demonstrated recovery and difference from worst case scenario, complete loss of language and other L MCA stroke symptoms mentioned above.

Recovery in stroke is front loaded. Would make strides in months and then not much further after. He could sit at what we see for life. He could basically return entirely to normal. Would be totally unsurprised if he’s back at pre stroke baseline in 3 months.

Also, even if there’s irreversible brain loss, in small cortical strokes, there’s always a lot of potential for recovery from neuroplasticity from surrounding brain tissue remodeling language networks. Especially in younger patients.

My mother had a stroke (actually a series of strokes) and has regained all of her speech and movement, just a couple of months later. She has some very minor short term memory issues but other than that you couldn't tell she had it at all. It really depends on exactly how much damage was done and where.

As a PSA make sure if you are on meds for high blood pressure you are getting your BP checked regularly, meds that were working can become ineffective and sometimes there can be very few warning signs until it is too late.

That is an awfully broad claim. Surely much depends on the severity of the stroke and the particular kind of stroke, as well as other factors. FWIW, Fetterman was released from the hospital nine days after his stroke, which seems on the short side, but perhaps not nowadays.

It's literal brain cell death which is why so much of the medical emphasis is on identifying a stroke happening and quickly responding to reduce how many brain cells die from lack of blood flow.

That is... quite horrifying and it sounds like he shouldn't be even running for election and should instead be trying to recover as much as possible before trying to handle the stresses of political decision-making.

I'm sure there would be enough people who are ready and willing to take the stresses of political decision-making on themselves for him if he's elected.

That is... quite horrifying and it sounds like he shouldn't be even running for election and should instead be trying to recover as much as possible before trying to handle the stresses of political decision-making.

This is solely based on second hand impressions from watching interviews and the like, but his wife gives off a serious Lady Macbeth/Hillary Clinton vibe. Cynically, I would guess that she's the real "power behind the throne" / one making the push here.

One of his current ads sort of obliquely addresses the stroke by talking about how nice it is that he got to spend time recovering with his family and how everyone should have the same opportunity... so send me to Washington to leave my family and do high stress, literal fucking life-or-death negotiations for the next six years! This campaign is the most amazing dumpster fire that I can remember.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats