site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   32068 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 31, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

24
Top Bottom New Old Controversial
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The red and blue cultures are qualitatively asymmetrical. Blue youths protest, sometimes en masse and sometimes in semi-orderly fashion. Red youths might attend a rally or organized protest, but the red protests pretty much started with Charlottesville and stopped with Jan 6. What you’re seeing is the lizardman’s constant on the right, the equivalent of the parade SUV massacre guy or the congressional softball shooter.

As for Mr. Pelosi’s friend David, I have yet to hear a coherent story from the left media which does fit that phone call, and the metadata on his blog is imposter levels of sus.

I don't see it that way. Charlottesville was a predominantly blue tribe protest, dissident blue tribe vs mainstream blue tribe where as the reason Jan 6th looms so large in the national psyche is that it was a red tribe protest that demonstrated a capability that the blue tribe didn't think the reds had.

The conventional wisdom is that protests need organization, corporate sponsorship, buy-in from the local attorney general, police forces etc... The idea of Trump supporters being able to not only organize a protest without such support but to do so in contested territory, to walk into the Democratic Party's holy of holies, and walk out with the high priestess' altar scared the fuck out them. Hence the outsize response by the FBI and all the talk from @ymeskhout and various others about how Jan 6th is the greatest threat to democracy since 9/11 or Pearl Harbor.

all the talk from @ymeskhout and various others about how Jan 6th is the greatest threat to democracy since 9/11 or Pearl Harbor

You have a nasty habit of making shit up about me

There’s been a handful of major red tribe protests since then, notably the trucker protests.

Yes and before then, but those aren't the ones being discussed.

The claim @DuplexFields claim that red tribe protests started with Charlottesville and ended with Jan 6th is patently false unless one is using an extremely unconventional definition of both "red tribe" and "protest".

Charlottesville was a predominantly blue tribe protest, dissident blue tribe vs mainstream blue tribe

I'm aware of your thesis about the "dissident/far/alt right" actually being leftists in rebellion, but come on, isn't this a reach? I understand that actual Blue Tribers don't have to agree, but this is too contrarian.

[Warning: highly online jargon]

Back when Reddit’s The_Donald was highly active, around the time of Hillary being appointed by the party over Bernie, we got a flood of salty Berniebros who were actively anti-Hillary and becoming walkaway/blackpilled re the Democratic Party establishment.

These were blue tribers who didn’t follow their party into the embrace of corporations and the intelligence-military-industrial complex, and who saw corporate media as the propaganda wing of the neocon❤️neolib New World Order. You can still see them bringing their memetic energy to patriots.win, The_Donald’s home in exile.

I don't think it's a reach at all, If anything Richard Spencer and the rest of the Taki's Mag Tiki-torch crew are central examples of what I'm talking about. IE a bunch of University of Chicago and UC Berkley Black Bloc types who arbitrarily decided one that that "oh we going to be right wingers now" without making any substantial changes to their beliefs or rhetoric. They thought they could "Unite The Right" by showing up at protest over a Confederate monument and being all like "Greetings fellow kids white nationalists" but they badly misread the crowd (both the opposition and their ostensible allies) because they were a bunch of University of Chicago and UC Berkley Black Bloc types who where completely out of their element.

"Blue tribe and red tribe" are different from "leftist and non-leftist". I would not be surprised if a supermajority of the 200ish people there were acculturated Blue Tribe types who had gotten themselves black-pilled over some forbidden knowledge.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats