This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I used to think he'd die of a Wendys induced heart attack while in office. For narrative reasons, the media would have no idea what to do with it.
Now I think he's going to die doing something genuinely heroic. Like, a Nazi or otherwise right wing terrorist will take an event he's at hostage and he'll get everyone else out saying "it's me you want, The Donald, not the waiters and these bozos" before getting shot. Because they would produce maximum confusion.
His dad lived to his 90s only succumbing to Alzheimer's, not something like heart disease or stroke. Trump has good genes for life expectancy, so he may stick around despite being overweight, ,not exercising much, and other risk factors.
More options
Context Copy link
Boy you sure have a different mental model of Trump's psyche than I do. I can't think of any public figure more demonstrably willing to throw his loyalists to the wolves for momentary personal advantage. Why do you imagine, under your framework, he didn't pardon the January 6 crowd before Biden was sworn in?
to not be impeached, removed, and barred from running again which was the explicit threat made by turtle Mitch?
could he have pardoned individuals not yet indicted? Jan 6th people were being arrested long after he left office.
He could have, yes. If he did, Turtle Mitch was threatening him with a "removal" vote which may bar him from running again. Would that "removal vote" be Constitutional? In my opinion, it would not be but the SCOTUS had already failed spectacularly to defend the constitutional order throughout the entire election.
More options
Context Copy link
Yes.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I believe Trump would throw himself on a bomb under the right circumstances. Of course, he would be thinking of how heroic and awesome and beloved he was, and how this would prove the Haters and Losers wrong, and of the yuge monument that would be built to honor his courage (bravest President ever? many are saying so), and probably not thinking about saving people. But Trump is capable of very self-destructive behavior, so long as it's in service of his own ego.
More options
Context Copy link
This isn't a model of how trump thinks or acts, I'm just riffing on how the universe seems to always produce max chaos around him. He's the Jungian incarnation of Loki the trickster God.
I want Maxx confusion. I want trump to die pulling trans kids out of a burning building, leave a will with money towards a giant gold pyramid on the mall, and no one will know what to do.
Consider the 1/6 stuff. If he had clearly said he supported the shaman dude in overthrowing the us government, he'd either be president for life or dead. If he'd clearly repudiated them and their election theories we'd be done with it. He did neither.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link