site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of June 23, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

6
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To Rightists with daughters reading this: are you concerned that they might encounter "natural family planning" on the internet and really f*** up their life?

No. Keeping their legs closed before marriage is entirely possible.

My daughter is more at risk of NEVER having any sex because she is at her tender age already obsessed with degenerate homosexual kpop boylove fics (RIP the Chatgpt server instance tasked to her). Between that and her godsis already being a degenerate goonette whose collection of bad dragons highly upsets even her somewhat liberal mother, the risk is more in the opposite direction. While the risk of infiltrators in good christian churches or feminist groups are both extant, the greater risk of women having impossible standards for men and defaulting to the internet rabbit hole instead is unexplored.

women having impossible standards for men

While there are definitely a minority of women on the internet demanding men be 6'5 self made millionaires who believe every woke shibboleth and yet act like conservatives, it seems like most women have eminently reasonable standards(be stably employed in a good job, not be a porn/substance/gambling addict, not a criminal, taller than her, etc) and simply aren't exposed to men who meet them.

My daughters generation expresses interest in sensitive artsy guys with glossy hair and perfect skin who happen to be straight. A particularly gnarly one is "good at talking" which used to be ok but now the boys apparently are using AI to do all their initial flirtations and the girls are copy pasting the messages into chatgpt to figure out if the boy is sincere and get mad at the AI for telling them things they don't want to hear.

The boys I know only have "not annoying' as a criteria. The older guys I know who have more stringent criterias are just avoiding rejection by seeking perfection, and I can't say the same for women. Sorry babe the hybrid of Benedict Cumberbatch and Asa Butterfield who also loves romantasy does not exist in straight versions.

Ah, yes, the ‘combination doesn’t go together’ problem.

With all due respect, when's the last time your looked for a partner? This isn't 1999.

If only those were women's standards. But it's not. Some of those things aren't important at all, in fact - not a criminal? Criminality's huge social proof of studliness to an awful lot of women.

the greater risk of women having impossible standards for men

A lot of women who are heavily invested in gay M/M content report enjoying it because it feels "safer" and "less complicated" than hetero content. They want to enjoy a romantic relationship in a "voyeuristic" way without having the worry about the imbalanced power dynamics that are intrinsically a part of any relationship between men and women. If the characters in the story are both men, then she can enjoy it without having to worry about the possibility of "self-inserting" as the female character and getting too personally enmeshed in the story, which could dredge up uncomfortable hang-ups about her own real life sexuality. It's not so much about running to the image of an idealized man as it is about running away from the dangers that real men present.

Obviously, it's something that she mostly has to work out for herself. I think the best thing you can do is to just set a good example in your relations with your own family, and if it ever seems appropriate to bring up, be open and honest about your own political views, what you perceive as the deleterious effects of modern wokeness, etc (the danger here isn't so much the porn per se, but rather the fact that the communities for this type of content tend to be filled with radfem and woke types who could reinforce negative beliefs).

As a male who enjoys the fine art of F/F content, I can relate.

Eh, asian blove fanfics also have a hanger on female protag who is juggling the affections of the male love interests simultaneously. Its "NOW KISH" spammed 10k times to get the girls motor firing before she gets her own back blown out.

Also, talking to a preteen girl? Can't lead a horse to water. Better the smiles and polite smalltalk rather than the nonstop passive aggressive war she's having with her mother. When puberty fully kicks in I might not even have that. Values can be communicated by proximate osmosis and source trustworthiness but kids trusting their peers over their parents for relatively inconsequential shit is hardwired into human social development. The communities of crazies are naturally repelling to themselves and those witch covens only perpetuate because their own parents never provided the safe space for acceptance and affirmation for the few times the girls did their nonverbal communication of issues. I have to be more than a dingbat doofus dad unfortunately but honestly I don't mind it that much. I survived a dramatic reading of My Immortal and a powerpoint party about head ratios to background scaling, I can survive a teenage girl geeking out about genderbent Arcane yaoi.