This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
It's hardly that. It's good evidence that he is in fact a thief, but it's not good evidence as to why he is a thief. As I pointed out in another comment, even someone stealing two bags at random would expect to get two women's bags about 25% of the time. When purely random targeting would yield the same results with decent frequency, the case is not settled beyond a reasonable doubt as to what his motives are.
People's argument basically boils down to "he's a sexual deviant in other ways, so this behavior must be related to his sexual deviancy". But that's a poor argument. I have the bad habit of drinking too much soda, it doesn't mean that if I steal two bags that it must be because I thought there was soda inside.
I don't think this is sexual fetish as such, but Brinton did look at the baggage tags. Now, if the tags just said "S. Smith", then it could be a guy's case. But if it was "Sally Smith", then they know this is (probably) a woman's case.
While we're all playing Herr Professor Freud here, I wonder if this is Brinton's way of getting back at their parents. The origin story is that they came out as bi to their Southern Baptist missionary parents, who sent them off to a 'conversion camp' for two years. Are the suitcases Brinton is stealing the type of cases their parents, particularly their mother, used on travels? Is this a subconscious attempt to both defy and shame the punitive parents by engaging in condemned behaviours? Yeah well who knows, we'll have to wait and see what happens after the court case in Minnesota (first) and then what happens in Nevada (the second alleged theft):
More options
Context Copy link
You’re not accounting for the full information available.
He specifically wants to steal suitcases.
He leaves the suitcases he steals in his hotel room.
Knowing that he is being extra scrutinized, he still chooses to steal suitcases at an airport rather than a thrift store or somewhere less risky.
There is evidence he does not steal random objects routinely (his gainful employment), yet that packed suitcases specifically are irresistible.
He loves to dress like a woman which is pretty good evidence for a motive, and humans commit crimes for motives. He is obsessed with this identity. There is no financial or acquisitive motive (left suitcase in room).
I thought he left the suitcases' contents in hotel rooms but allegedly kept and used the suitcases themselves?
They claimed they left the woman's clothes behind in the hotel room but not the suitcase which they took with them, but the hotel denied that any clothing had been left in the room.
More options
Context Copy link
I hadn’t read that but if true it would poke a hole in my theory
More options
Context Copy link
He claimed he did that, but the hotel denied it.
More options
Context Copy link
That was his story in the middle. I'd be curious to (have somebody else) search his drawers though, to see if there's evidence of trophy-taking.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link