site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of December 12, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

15
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sam Bankman-Fried has been arrested.

FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried was arrested by Bahamian authorities this evening after the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York shared a sealed indictment with the Bahamian government, setting the stage for extradition and U.S. trial for the onetime crypto billionaire at the heart of the crypto exchange’s collapse.

Bankman-Fried was expected to testify before the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday. His arrest is the first concrete move by regulators to hold individuals accountable for the multi-billion dollar implosion of FTX last month.

There had been some speculation on when and even whether he would be arrested. Just yesterday someone told me to expect it to take two years. So, why right before tomorrow's hearing? And why not wait for him to give more interviews and provide more evidence?

This is apparently the new idea floating around parts of (Crypto?) Twitter right now: that SBF might get "Epsteined," meaning he will end up dead in a manner most suspicious. I don't want to give it any credence, but maybe the people saying it would have taken years for the long arm of the law to nab SBF were onto something, since if they're getting him this quickly, then one of two possibilities must be true:

  1. The Occam's Razor explanation: SBF running his mouth for the past month or so has given the government all the ammo they need to throw the book at him, saving a lot of time and effort in building a solid case against him.

  2. The Tinfoil Hat explanation(s): TPTB are planning for anything but SBF seeing a day in jail. Either the speed of the actions against him are meant to blow their load early, preventing a substantial investigation that would end in his punishment (and thus letting him walk away scot-free), or they really are going the conspiracy theory-type route of planning to have him murdered and (try to) make it look like an accident/suicide.

  1. Evidence emerged in the last few days of plans by SBF to travel somewhere where he would be more difficult to apprehend. Which might be as simple as discovering a hidden crypto or fiat account which may be able to fund such a trip. Or as small as sometime stating in an interview that sbf had casually talked to them about what countries don't extradite. So they moved fast for fear of SBF trying to Snowden himself.

I've joked at home that if it were me, I'd already be at my distant uncle's house in Iran. "Hey uncle Mo, bad news is you're stuck with me and I speak very little Farsi, good news is even after the decline I still have $2mm in stolen Bitcoin."

No prosecutor wants to see the big fish run away to Russia. Would Israel extradite him? That's not even that bad a country to live in.

That mysterious hack which took an unknown sum of money certainly sounds like somebody stashing funds away, and it strongly indicates Bankman-Fried or one of his two co-founders. If it was Bankman-Fried, it's surprising that he stuck around so long and didn't run. But he may have believed he could spoof his way out of trouble and that any arrest would be far in the future.