This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
"pro-Trump billionaires" doesn't really seem accurate. They were billionaire Republican donors who didn't support Trump until he was the candidate.
It's just SBF funnelling big donor money into giving more power to the Professional–managerial class.
Why is the Professional-managerial class so unified on support for Israel?
Of course the leftist author can only look at this through a class lens and totally ignore the ethnic motivations to this unity between these Dem Pacs spending the vast majority of their money on democratic primaries, AIPAC, and "pro-Trump billionaires". They always have to say it's about class and "power to the Professional-managerial class" and remain willfully blind to the truth of the dual-loyalty of these Jews who spend enormous amounts of money and political influence to secure the standing of their ethnostate in American politics.
These groups aren't working together for their class interests. They are doing so for their ethnic interests and their loyalty to Israel.
I mean, look at this:
Even when a leftist does excellent work in doing research and connecting the dots, he's ultimately confronted with the hard limits on the Marxist lens of political analysis. When asking what these people: SBF, Mark Mellman, Jewish billionaires, and AIPAC have in common, his answer is that they are all "financial and political elites who protect the status quo." Come on, it's just too much. Really shows the hard limits of class reductionism that he can't see what he is clearly laying down in front of his own face.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link