site banner
PaperclipPerfector  6d ago (text post)   2936 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for October 19, 2025

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

1
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Catholics: how often do you go to confession?

Between two weeks and once a month. Usually not at my regular parish, because they stubbornly try to have confession mostly at 10 am on a Monday type times.

10 am on a Monday

I swear they do this on purpose. It's like they want people to ignore traditional eucharistic discipline.

Its not just this, its not just Priests/Churches. All institutions, unless there are powerful forces working constantly to counter it, will eventually be run and organized for the convenience and status of the people who have power within it, and not whatever 'mission' the institution ostensibly was created for. Hospitals are a great example of this.

No, these are priests living in a bubble and writing a schedule they can mesh with the rest of their very busy schedules- seriously the average Catholic priest in the US works like 80 hours a week before being on call every two to three weeks and is also at the very least in late middle age. The obvious answer is to move the rest of their schedules around. It's just an unpopular answer.

You are correct that liberal Catholic priests tend to be much worse about this than conservative ones- and the results of this can be seen in very long confession lines at Catholic parishes which make a priority of offering confessions evenings/early mornings(yes, if confession is available at 6 am there will be a line to go to it)/weekends. But I go to an actual Latin Mass parish; the decision to try to steer people to going to confession midmorning monday-friday is not taken out of the idea that people should be receiving in a state of mortal sin. It's due practical scheduling concerns.

Why do priests have on call rotations? Is this like a doctor where a priest can't go to the movies if they are on call because they would have to silence their phone?

At all the protestant churches I've been a member of (some 20 person congregations, some 2000), the pastors are basically always "on call" in the sense that if a member has an emergency they can call the pastor to (e.g.) visit them in the hospital. But the pastors are never expected to walk around with a phone all the time like an on-call doctor would.

The Catholic religion requires a sacramental priesthood- a priest going to the hospital is not just providing comfort to the dying. There is an actual sacramental function there.

I understand the importance of sacraments and that's partly the cause of my confusion. I'm just curious about the mechanical details of "on call" and if it's the same level of rigor as other on call professions like doctors. Can an on call priest not go to the movies? Maybe a priest wouldn't go to the movies anyways, but can they be "on call" while they are doing other priestly duties? (What if someone calls them while they are delivering the Eucharist? I assume they wouldn't interrupt a sacrament to take a phone call. But what if they are performing non-sacramental priestly duties like leading an AA meeting? Do they interrupt the AA meeting to take a phone call?) My understanding was always that places that were likely to need sacraments (like a hospital) had dedicated Catholic priests working at the hospital to provide them, and not that the local parish priest was on call in his bed and would be summoned if needed.

An in particular, cell phones did not exist 50 years ago, and the Catholic church survived 2000 years without them. So how did the idea of "on call" actually develop? It just seems like the sort of modernism that an ancient, slow moving tradition would be hesitant to adopt.

On call before cell phones worked off of pagers. I don’t know how it worked before then. Rushing to fetch a priest was an old timey trope, though.

Hospitals have Catholic chaplains, but even if those chaplains are priests they’re not on duty 24/7. Usually those chaplains are actually deacons who do not have the full range of sacramental powers. Priests who get a call to the hospital are expected to drop meetings, classes, etc to just go; they probably don’t have their phones on for mass or hearing confessions. Catholics are expected to receive unrepeatable sacraments(confirmation and anointing of the sick are the relevant ones here- sometimes baptisms in the NICU) from their parish priest, although during Covid this was changed a bit to have priests nearest the hospitals complying with whatever protocols.

Usually those chaplains are actually deacons who do not have the full range of sacramental powers.

Makes sense, in a hospital there's less reason to care if they don't have the full suite of healing spells. Do your part yourself if you're so great, science.

Thanks. I still have lots of questions, but I appreciate the response :)

I didn't know that deacons would work in hospitals; I've only ever met priests there before.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats