site banner
PaperclipPerfector  4d ago (text post)   15560 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 10, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Welp, turns out more Epstein files are finally getting released!

Apparently there will be a vote coming out to release even more, but the docs released so far have been negative for Trump's claims to be innocent of the whole matter.

This, combined with the ruckus over Trump arguing we need foreign talent, has caused a massive cratering amongst online confidence in MAGA. From my perspective, confidence in MAGA at least online is the lowest it has ever been. Many feel betrayed by Trump when it comes to his America First promises.

Add in the storm over Fuentes and Israel, and I feel I'm seeing the conservative coalition fall apart in real time, extremely quickly.

Is this inevitable, the narcissism of small differences? Or is it just Trump not being a very principled man?

There are also interesting leaks from DropSiteNews who obtained Ehud Barak’s hacked emails. Epstein helped write Barak’s op-eds for war in the Middle East, aided Israel’s security deals in Mongolia / Russia / Africa, hosted an Israeli intelligence officer at his apartment for weeks… the notion that Epstein was an independent agent or a CIA affiliate is no longer tenable.

Nothing in this evidence contradicts my theory. Certainly nothing suggests that Epstein was plucked out of his high school teacher job (or perhaps placed in it, as the Barr theories suggest - even though they don’t even understand the forward passage of time) by Israeli intelligence in the mid-1970s and given a world-historical mission by the Mossad, which is what is widely alleged.

That Epstein befriended Barak in the 1990s and that his personal assistant (the “Israeli intelligence officer” in question, since most senior personal staff to Israeli leaders come through intelligence) enjoyed Epstein’s hospitality as his boss did were both widely known. I explicitly stated that Epstein had worked his way into powerful circles by the late 90s (his friendship with Prince Andrew only the most famous). He “brought some leaders together” (as I have said, much of this was braggadocio), opined on American and global politics and wrote articles for said powerful foreign friends (or had associates do so).

What would convince you that Epstein was Israeli intelligence? The emails show Epstein advising the former PM of Israel (& head of military intelligence) Barak on sensitive Israeli security matters and spy tech transfers. He ghostwrote Barak’s pro-Israel editorials. Barak’s intelligence officer assistant stayed with Epstein unaccompanied by Barak on multiple occasions. We have two confessions (Jane Doe #200, Hoffenberger) and one confirmation (Ben-Menashe told by Robert Maxwell). Two American former senior intelligence analysts believe Epstein was Mossad (John Schindler / John Kiriakou). He was funded and gifted by Wexner, receiving literally nothing for his funding, and Wexner ran a secret group of Jewish billionaires who funded Israeli and Jewish causes in America. His accomplice Ghislaine was the daughter of an Israeli “super spy”. The extent of surveillance in his residences makes no sense except for kompromat purposes. Israel has a history of rigging apartments for blackmail.

Surely the chance of Epstein having all these close relationships is statistically improbable. He just happened to be funded by Israel’s top billionaire, happened to be working with the daughter of a super spy, happened to be best friends with former intelligence leader of Israel, happened to also help him with sensitive security issues…

His accomplice Ghislaine was the daughter of an Israeli “super spy”.

She was the daughter of a man who facilitated arms deals from the Eastern Bloc to Israel early in its history and so was held in very high regard by the old cadres of the Mossad several decades later, sure.

What would convince you that Epstein was Israeli intelligence?

The Israel connections came through Wexner, whom he met in the late 1980s in Palm Beach. Israel didn’t need Epstein to build relationships with wealthy Zionist billionaires. He used Wexner’s network to meet other billionaires and because Wexner was/is a passionate zionist, others like the Mega group / Ron Lauder.

What would convince me? Very simple. A single shred of evidence that Epstein had even the faintest connection to Israel or Israeli intelligence before he became a close associate of Les Wexner. Given that, as I have documented extensively, Epstein’s self-professed connections to the world of Annan Khashoggi in the arms market in the early 1980s were largely or entirely fabricated (by himself), I think none exists.

Epstein met Wexner in 86-87, before he began trafficking girls (90s) and right before the scam with Hoffenberg (87). The chronology is in line with Wexner (Israeli intelligence via Wexner) facilitating Epstein’s activities in the 90s. Whatever Epstein was doing before then doesn’t mean much IMO, as his charisma alone would have made him a useful sayan. Was he loafing around and ingratiating with the elites? Useful. Was he already engaged in the underworld? Even more useful.

The claim that Robert Maxwell was a spy (or more accurately sayan) can be sourced from Ostrovsky’s Way of Deception:

Suddenly, the sinister nature of what was being done with Maxwell became clear to me. In his zeal to cooperate with Israel, and even though he was not an agent himself {as the British had made clear when I had spoken to them in Washington), Maxwell was a sayan on the grand scale. The Mossad was financing many of its operations in Europe from moneys stolen from the man's newspaper pension fund. They got their hands on the pension funds almost as soon as he'd made his purchases (initially with money lent to him by the Mossad and on expert advice he received from Mossad analyses). What was sinister about it, aside from the theft, was that anyone in his news organization, anywhere in the Middle East, was automatically suspected of working for Israel and was only one rumor away from the hangman's noose. I explained to my host, as I had to the British, that in the beginning the Mossad would help Maxwell purchase the newspapers by lending him money and causing labor disputes and other problems, making the target purchases more vulnerable. Later, the tactics changed; they would target in advance a paper that he was to purchase and start it on a collision course with bankruptcy using all available strategies, starting with workforce agitation and ending with pullback of funds from the paper through bankers and advertisers sympathetic to the Mossad. Then, once the target was softened, they'd send Maxwell in for the kill.

[…] The ties between Maxwell and the Mossad went back a long way. Elements within the Mossad had offered to finance Maxwell's first big business ventures, and in later years Maxwell received inside information on global matters from the Office. Maxwell was originally code-named "the Little Czech," and the sobriquet stuck. Only a handful of people in the Israeli intelligence community knew who the Little Czech was, yet he provided an unending supply of slush money for the organization whenever it ran low. For years, Maxwell would hit financial lows whenever the Mossad was in the midst of expensive operations that could not be funded legitimately and when other less legitimate sources were unavailable, as was the case after the American invasion of Panama in 1990, which dried up the Mossad's income from drug trafficking and forced Maxwell to dig deep into his corporate pockets

I still suspect there was probably cooperation with the CIA, hence why they never did anything about this massive security breach.

Wait, what? @Rafa, does this change your calculus about Epstein?

Not at all, in fact I discussed Epstein’s personal connection with Ehud Barak several times in my posts; they met in the 1990s as Epstein was rising in the world and as he was courting various world leaders. The “Israeli intelligence officer” was Barak’s personal assistant, who travelled with him. The op eds he wrote were for mainstream newspapers, it would make sense as a foreigner in the pre-chagpt era to get your rich, charismatic, native English speaking friend to write them instead of doing so yourself.

Interesting. Thanks for the reply.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats