site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of February 6, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I was sent this tweet which claims that the majority of Republicans voted against an offer to spend billions in border protection. This goes against my understanding of the GOP. Am I missing some context that would explain this?

deleted

He has cancer.

deleted

Mmm, I don’t think you should feel like an ass. Hes trying to elicit the feeling you’re having now. He’s an asshole, not you.

Trying to make @urquan feel like an ass by... having cancer?

What do you want him to do, if he didn't wear the bandana people would be all "who does he think he is, Lex Luthor" and then feel like an ass about that.

This is trivially disproved by there being millions of bald people, and hundreds of bald politicians, who nobody calls "Lex Luthor". Cory Booker looks like a cueball, and people call him a lot of names, but I haven't heard "Lex Luthor". Look here at the collection of shiny noggins and tell me who called them "lex Luthor" ever? https://www.gq.com/gallery/bald-100

Not many politicians wear bandanas though. It is not a very common garment for a politician, so when a politician wears one, it looks weird and its legitimate to ask questions. If you noticed above, Hulk Hogan wears one. He's not a member of Congress (not yet at least). Just as if somebody would wear a bathrobe and slippers or a wedding dress into Congress. There might be a legit reason or just a person fashion choice, but it has little to do with baldness as such or the reason for it.

People who are bald because of chemo wear bandanas, it's a thing. I don't know why it's a thing, but it is.

Wear a hat? Shave his head?

Jamie Raskin is a lifelong grifting rage baiting asshole who continues spreading the insane propaganda lies about Russian spies in the White House.

He also used this opportunity to spread more rage baiting lies, claiming republicans had insisted that he take his bandana off.

This was, of course, a lie: https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-jamie-raskin-cap-chemotherapy-republicans-house-representatives-1778293

So he wears a bandana, nobody cares except to tell him that they hope he pulls through with his cancer, and he uses this as an opportunity to claim that his political opponents are cartoonish villains, and that his bandana is a form of resistance.

Yes, him wanting you to feel like an asshole, and using his bandana to do so, is very literally what he is doing

It's a really common style for cancer patients who've lost their hair from the chemo (I don't know why but it is); are all of the other cancer patients assholes, or are you just using this as an excuse to vent about somebody who's politics you clearly don't like very much?

I'm not disputing that cancer patients wear bandanas. I'm saying that in this specific case he made his wearing of a bandana a political tool, and lied about people to do so.

More comments

I've seen lots of bald politicians. I've never seen one cosplaying Prison Mike.

TBH, about 90% of people there without the bandanas don't either. Unfortunately, most of the clowns there don't dress the part - that at least would be mildly entertaining.