This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I think in a way both sides were right about Gamergate. On the one hand, it really was about women entering into a "boys' club" space, not ethics in gaming journalism. So at the level of literal claims, the feminists were basically correct. However, I don't think it was wrong to oppose women entering a men's space and seeking to change it, just the pro-Gamergate side didn't have the language to frame this in a sympathetic way so they avoided saying it.
What was happening to gaming and online nerd spaces (like Reddit itself) was essentially a form of gentrification. You had a "marginalized" community (nerds) that had made something interesting in their ghettoized spaces (videogaming, online forums like Reddit, open source software, tabletop games). The mainstream that had previously stigmatized them decided they wanted to move in, force out the original communities and sanitize them for mainstream consumption. The same process that happened to Reddit is what leftists complain about when it happens to some neighborhood in Queens.
Anyway, as for my own personal journey through it, I was a bit older than you. All of this happened after I had already graduated college, and so I never really got invested in the whole Youtube debate/criticism sphere. I never watched Sargon of Akkad or Jordan Peterson or whoever. I think it was around that time, 2013 or 2014 that my brother sent me a link to one of the more popular SlateStarCodex posts which became my entry point.
Status 451's Social Gentrification post is an absolute must-read, if you haven't already.
Wow, now that's a blog I haven't thought of in a long time. I'm pretty sure the creator was a regular on the Motte subreddit (or even the old /r/SSC CW thread?).
I can also vaguely recall a commenter with that username but couldn't find it on Reddit.
His username was different than the site name. And I think he was a pretty high quality poster back when he posted. Can't remember who it was.
I also noticed that he is the author of the Days of Rage review I came across ages ago. Dejá vu indeed.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I would say that both of these things were instances of a broader problem. It spread from the latter to include the former because they were instances of a broader problem.
More options
Context Copy link
There were always women into gaming. What happened during gamergame that we get entrysts. And the game journalists bowed to them declaring practices and parts of games "problematic". Now gaming was always egalitarian - you either can consistently railgun someone from half a map away or you are pathetic subhuman. And if you are pathetic subhuman you shut up. Now suddenly we had whining about trash talk in chats and not having black people in medieval poland. And the game developers and journalists took their side. Now the ruin did came for the AAAA industry, but it was completely avoidable. Just give the people that consume and pay for your fucking products what they want.
More options
Context Copy link
No, it never was.
Well, I think it was a factor -- with some nuance. The reality is that women have always been welcome in male-dominated hobby spaces, such as computer gaming; chess; and so on. Provided that those women are genuine enthusiasts.
But what happens -- sometimes -- is that a hobby which was formerly low status; something for basement-dwelling losers, suddenly increases in status and respectability. That's definitely happened with computers. What happened next was that status was a magnet for women who weren't necessarily interested in the hobby itself but rather the status, money, and male attention which would come from getting involved. Thus, the "fake geek girl." When men inevitably (and reasonably) object to these interlopers, it opens the door for grifters like Aneeta Sarkesian to play the role of damsel in distress.
What's especially infuriating about these types is they typically attempt to re-write history. They insist that in the past, women were excluded from these spaces -- a lie which is about as wrong as wrong can be.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link