Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 172
- 0
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Best Hindsight Trader: If, around 15-25 February, you thought trump was going to attack iran in the next weeks, what should you have done ?
Buy oom USO calls expiring march 20 for 1500 % gain. Which are just repackaged oil futures, but I'm not fucking with margin.
What I did instead: bought oom spy puts expiring march 20. Exited yesterday for modest gains.
Very interesting that the other possibility, short-term oom calls on american oil companies, also wouldn't have worked. Despite the record rise in oil prices, they barely moved. Apparently the market thinks this will all blow over in a week? OK, buying oom calls on oil companies.
It might've worked if you closed the position right at market open, when the euphoria was at its peak.
Resource producers (almost) always lag these kind of spikes because they can't really profit that much from them unless the change is confirmed to be structural.
I don't believe the market anymore. I imagine my counterpart: a guy in glasses looking at the discrepancy between the rising oil prices and the unmoved oil companies; not reacting, because he thinks he knows those companies, their current balance sheets, he has status quo bias; he thinks that surely things will go back, trump will taco, and the future curve has a reassuring bend; but in reality, this is merely probable, it's not sure at all. They are not the same companies they were a month ago; the possibility that the hormuz strait stays closed should be priced in, and it isn't.
"The market can stay irrational longer than you stay solvent" is definitely the investing phrase of the decade.
Decade?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link