This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
We did that. It's called the Protestant Reformation. How do you like your megachurches?
There's also the splinter 'Catholic' denominations like the Old Catholics or the Women Priests (a couple at least separate ones of these) or the liberal parishes still formally within the Church or the very traditionalist ones which split off around Vatican II and eventually went either full-bore liberal themselves or totally nuts (I'm distinguishing these from the traditionalist ones who remained in communion).
(I'm with Cardinal Arinze on this kind of thing).
A separate denomination means separate theology and separate doctrines, so you can't call it "the" Catholic Church if it splits. You're looking for something more like the Anglican Communion where it's all separate national churches who can go their own way if they feel like it but are in loose bonds of association.
It also depends how you measure "spiritual change" and "fruits"; 'we now accept and ordain gay trans lady bishops in polyamorous relationships who refer to God as 'she' amongst one set of the deities of your choice or none and are also Muslim Buddhist Wiccan rabbis' may be deemed the greatest, most advanced, spiritual fruit by one set of measurements and completely the opposite by a different set of measurements.
This is not the typical Protestant experience. I've heard Protestants in person unkindly mocking megachurches.
Back when I was young and went to church twice a week with my family we went to small local churches. Like every churchgoer did.
Oh, indeed, but if OP was wanting breaking up into separate denominations to compete on attractive art and something, then they have to accept that some of that competition results in the likes of megachurches, which copied the poor parts of secular pop culture and decided this was the future of church.
I can't throw stones when it comes to terrible architecture and crimes against liturgy, because we have our fill of concrete warehouses post-Vatican II as churches, not to mention one horrible example of wreckovation from my own town where an inoffensive 19th century Gothic Revival parish church was pulled to pieces in the name of accessibility or some stupidity, and now the interior is a mess and the marble etc. that past generations proudly contributed towards, for the sake of beauty, has been ripped out and would have been dumped or otherwise disposed of, had not a local group managed to repurpose some of it for a grotto on a main road.
There's also the other example, where cherrypicking from liturgies and architecture and vestments and icons of Orthodox traditions has been co-opted by liberal churches; they have the beautiful visuals but they also burnish their LGBT+ credentials. One has one's own opinion on how fruitful this is, and indeed it may well be, but it's not producing anything of its own, it's copying the past because it's aesthetically appealing.
I think a church/denomination needs more than merely aesthetic appeal.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
There are plenty of groups which don’t have normal jurisdiction from Rome but in practice accept its doctrinal authority, ranging from the (not)Polish national Catholic Church to the Sspx. It was well into the twentieth century by the time the pope appointed the majority of the world’s bishops.
Is unity important? Yes. Is it evidently possible to prevent governance by lunacy without it? Also yes.
More options
Context Copy link
I don’t see why you couldn’t have a situation like in Orthodox Christianity where national churches are granted a degree of autonomy in local matters and cultural practices while being obligated to uphold the things that the orthodox churches have declared dogma or required practices.
In the Catholic Church, this effectively exists at the sub-national level in Bishops. The autonomy of Bishops pertaining to the matters of their own (arch)diocese is quite broad.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link