This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Why would you think Fox News would represent the most extreme right-wingers?
From Breitbart:
See, the SoH toll is a good thing!
Comments section (are these real people? AI? Russian bots? I'll never know) is euphoric:
I was wondering how conservatives would face the reckoning from this debacle; our regulars here who routinely claimed the 'Uniparty' (encompassing Bush, Obama, Biden and some unclear number of their predecessors up to their favorite historical president) was responsible for Iraq/Afghanistan while Trump executed a clean break with 'America First' have been oddly silent for the last month. If the conflict rekindles and turns into another Forever War, I predict Trump will be relegated to the Uniparty With Jewish Characteristics, while Jay Dee or his successor is packaged as another Clean Break from RINOs. If this is truly the end of the war, I expect them to double down on the glorious special military operation narrative.
If you're expecting a mea culpa or acceptance of the fuckup...I'd take the other end of that bet any day of the week.
These are all fake posts, AI, Russian, both, or otherwise. I've seen enough political posts on Facebook from verifiable salt-of-the-earth conservatives to be able to spot fakes:
Perhaps "most extreme" was a bit of hyperbole; when people bring up the Fox comment section to provide examples of conservative idiocy, someone always points out that it isn't representative, and I wanted to avoid that accusation. But it is representative of a certain kind of conservative idiocy, the kind of person who creates an account just so they can respond to a comment they agree with with "Bingo".
More options
Context Copy link
🙋♂️
The name "Shakes" should be in your mouth at all times for he remains a plan-truster and Trump's most loyal soldier.
More options
Context Copy link
If the SOH toll funds yachts with Russian hookers then it’s probably fine. If it funds guns and funding foreign militias then bad.
Then Iran essentially just becomes 20 years behind the Saudis.
More options
Context Copy link
You leave off another Trump victory: for years Iran has sanctioned the global economy, refusing to trade with it or accept investments from it. Trump has forced them to drop those sanctions and open themselves up to the world.
This, but unironically.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link