site banner
PaperclipPerfector  6d ago (text post)   26275 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 6, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Strait is still closed, you are impotent to resolve that. Genocidal threats, begging for help, counterblockades, general pathetic thrashing. Any timeline on actual solution? This is a costly chimpout for the rest of us.

This is a costly chimpout for the rest of us.

I think the term is "vae victis".

Indeed, though rather than applying to the US or Iranian governments it more aptly applies to the Occupiers of the Government who chose this war vs the Occupied tax cattle expected to pay the price for it.

Wasn’t America supposed to have surrendered and accepted terms by now? I thought mining the straits was supposed to be some death blow to American empire but apparently Trump is fine with blockading it himself

Your only rejoinder to the fact that America is losing is the fact that it hasn't surrendered yet? By this kind of logic, if I told you the US accepted a strategic defeat and begrudgingly pulled out of Iran, you'd still claim it's a victory because the Iranians didn't conquer the moon.

  • America destroyed 80-90% of Iran’s military in weeks
  • Lost one pilot and pulled off an unprecedented military operation within Iranian territory that made a mockery of Iranian integrity
  • America now controls a near-majority of global oil supplies while other countries face a deficit
  • America is about to blockade the straits itself, which was supposed to be Iran’s leverage against America

Sure yeah America is losing I’m sure we’ll surrender any day now

America destroyed 80-90% of Iran’s military in weeks

80-90% of what?

80-90% of missiles? No.

80-90% of drones? No.

80-90% of IRGC troops? No.

80-90% of fast attack craft? No.

And Iran has the largest missile arsenal out of any single other country in the entire Middle East... I actually wonder if I'm being trolled or not.

My understanding is that the US is depleting it's stockpiles and it's causing concern amongst the administration. Especially because our high tech conventional arms rely heavily on advanced guidance and strike systems, which are in turn dependent on accessing key supplies of rare Earth metals that are overwhelmingly found in China. Restocking and resupplying these munitions isn't a walk in the park. Those supply chains are extremely fragile and the dependencies on them is enormous.

Restocking and resupplying these munitions isn't a walk in the park.

The US can build more than 100 JDAMs bomb kits per day, and there are good reasons to believe that the US has switched a substantial portion of its strike packages over to JDAMS.

This does not necessarily mean that more bespoke munitions like JASSMs, which might be employed for a number of reasons, are off the table.

Yeah... I'm definitely curious to know where you're getting your news from so all of these claims can be vetted.

Just to take one of your points as an example, I assume this is the rescue operation of the pilot in question that you're referring to? I hope you'll forgive me for doubting official statements made on this matter; because I'm not buying it. The massive show of force is highly disproportionate for a discreet personal recovery mission.

There's precedent for the US pulling out the stops in rescue operations.

It's definitely possible that the entire story isn't being told, but the rescue mission wouldn't be unprecedented.

I actually like history legends videos but he's definitely a pro russian shill. You have to take everything he says with a massive dose of salt.

Frankly I don't care about labels, no matter what the source. You have to address the arguments made by people, not the person. There's a very serious deficit of critical thinking in the population that goes dangerously unaddressed. Even in more intellectual circles.

You shouldn't read sources that only suit your preconceived ideas. You pay attention to both sides. All cranks distrust sources merely because they disagree with them and they often use no valid appeals to evidence to justify their claims. Back when I was in school and Wikipedia first became a thing, there was a lot of controversy using it as a source when doing your homework. It's been demonstrated to be just as reliable as any other encyclopedia. Which is to say, not great; but it's better than asking Uncle Joe. The principal value it has is that it at least tries and makes an effort to have a cited source for a claim, and more than that, one that is a 'good' source as opposed to a bad one. Because of that, it's a valuable place to begin when you decide to want to start "doing your own research."

You have to address the arguments made by people, not the person.

It's more than just arguments, it's evidence and what sources they cite. If someone is constantly citing the Weekly World News as their proof that Bat Boy exists (or worse, is straight up lying or making up their own fake evidence), it doesn't matter how good their arguments are for why Bat Boy is real. There have been tons of lies on all sides of the Ukraine war, and I'm extremely skeptical of any of the Youtubers that regularly comment on the war because of the amount of sheer lies many of them have peddled.

I literally said that I watch his videos, but you're proving nothing if you just give his hot take on the situation without corroborating it with other mainstream reporting or alternatively osint info.

The US government and mainstream news companies are reporting we infiltrated Iran to rescue our guy. You are not going to bait me into trusting some pimply YouTuber instead and I am not going to watch a 23-minute video to find out if he says anything interesting. Frankly this is embarrassing. It’s always possible if not likely that the official story covers up deeper truths but if you don’t believe basic facts about the war there’s nothing for us to argue about. Maybe the Iranians are marching on Washington as we speak.

So then I assume Trumo/Hegseth and CNN are who you're quoting?

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats