site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1d ago (text post)   1338 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for May 1, 2026

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

1
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just finished Stranger Things Season 4, after taking a long hiatus following season 3. I had assumed the law of diminishing returns would apply but was presently surprised that 4, imo, was the strongest season since the first. Taking things in a more horror inspired direction seemed to be just the right move to reinvigorate things while still developing in an organic way from the original premise. I've heard season 5 isn't great; should I end on a high note?

Watching S5 right after S4 is probably the best way to consume it; I wouldn't Episode 2 yourself just because 3 isn't as good.

The problem with S5 is fundamentally that the script is what it would look like if you had ChatGPT re-write S1 by prompting it to continue S4. And I mean that in every sense of the word; it's safe for kids, the villain has returned to being a stock character, the main characters regressed to pre-S1 levels of plot development, and the new developments make zero sense in context.

I would suggest that when watching, the instant you realize you're losing interest in what happens, go straight to the finale and don't watch any of the other episodes. You couldn't do this if you were watching at release and you're not also waiting on S5, which are the 2 dynamics that people who dislike S5 are usually ignoring when they say it ruined the show for them.

Taking things in a more horror inspired direction seemed to be just the right move to reinvigorate things while still developing in an organic way from the original premise

It needed to develop into a "tales of" sort of thing, much like FNAF did (and quite successfully, I might add). S4/S5 would have worked well as a one-shot with a new set of kid actors, and the parts of S5 that involve said actors are still half-decent for that reason. But there wasn't as much required foresight in this case to pull that off, and they were kind of chained to using the old cast far beyond the point it made sense (which completely destroys Will's characterization in particular). But you'll find that out as you watch.

We did the first two episodes of S5 last night. So far I quite like it; I'll try to maintain momentum and finish strong. I definitely know what you mean about the actors. It's not so bad with the older kids, but it can be hard to suspend disbelief when you're watching someone whose in their twenties notionally playing a high school sophomore

someone whose in their twenties notionally playing a high school sophomore

Look at it as a layer of unintentional meta-authenticity. This is the most 1980's thing the series has ever done.

I also enjoyed season 4. Season 5 was lazy slop. But it was at least better than the last season of Game of Thrones and didn't entirely and retroactively ruin the show for me. Its a low bar to clear, but many shows fail it.

I am always surprised at much praise season 4 gets. In my mind it’s the worst of the first four; as it’s a giant retcon/reboot that just creates a new show inside of another one’s skin using the familiarity of the characters to sneak it through.

I think each season is dramatically worse than the one before it.

As for season 5 - go ahead and finish it. However, enjoyers and haters of season 4 alike find it bad. The only camp of fans I think is those who like all of ST uncritically

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats