site banner
PaperclipPerfector  4mo ago (text post)   3580 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for May 24, 2026

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Currently reading:

  • Desolation Island Patrick O'Brian
  • The Monastery of the Damned Nicholas Tobias
  • Interwar Articles Ernst Junger
  • The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865 Mark Peterson
  • High Output Management Andrew S. Grove

I’m trying my hand again at A Fire Upon The Deep. I made an attempt at it some years back, but it’d always been one that remained in the back of my mind and I’ve since had a commitment to myself to eventually return to it. I think what may be key to it is to go slower than my usual reading speed.

I found the tomato surprise about the pack aliens clever, but annoying.

Wait, what’s the surprise? The echolocation thing was introduced organically, as was the genetic/value drift from avoiding inbreeding. At least, I don’t remember the plot hinging on anything else that should have been common knowledge to a bunch of stranded humans…

The very first chapter set on the planet is written from the viewpoint of one of the alien packs, so you keep encountering weird turns of phrase that make no sense and have to slowly guess what the hell is going on: "Okay, does each dude have a pack of doglike animals with them that they have a tight bond with like in Starship Troopers? No, do they control them like riggers in Shadowrun? Wait, there's no one else, does their conscience simply hop between the dog bodies? Oh, o-oh, I get it now, it's like a hivemind, but with a small number of animals, an oligomind!"

Which is, as I've said, a clever trick, but I still don't like it.

I read it not that long ago, and enjoyed it. I want to claim I finished every novel set in that particular universe, and that's probably true.

I thought it was fantastic the first time, but have never been able to re-read it and I have no idea why. But I've read A Deepness In the Sky twice and loved it both times.

The galactic Usenet feels hilariously dated nowadays.

It ranks up there with the sock puppet subplot in Ender’s Game, yeah.

I go back and forth on the viability of that in the modern era: there are certainly solo discussion influencers on social media that shape ongoing politics, if not as directly. This site has loose associations with several such folks.

But it certainly would take a Wiggin-caliber poster to make it viable, and to have that much sway. But I also don't see any of the current crop parlaying it into global political office.

I don’t know why that is either… Because I’m not a usual fiction reader, but I love stories like that. For some reason it just never clicked with me previously. One thing I will say though is audio productions of all the old classics have offered me a great deal of renewed enjoyment to re-experience. I’d recently listened to the Dorsai series a couple years ago after I’d read the books even years prior to that, and it was a great experience.

I really need to read some Junger. Never heard of him before the SSC reviews of Marble Cliffs but his work sounds so cool.

There are basically three Jungers - the man lived to be a hundred and two. The early Junger, roughly Storm of Steel to The Worker, is a warrior-poet writing on his war experiences and how the War (and particularly the emergence of technology's power over man) changed the world. He rejects the Nazis when they come to power and his techno-nationalist thought takes a mystical turn, this is where we get Marble Cliffs and some of his real hidden gems. After WWII, he's able to write more freely, and his thought becomes explicitly centered on individual inner freedom under the rule of technology, with The Forest Passage and Eumeswil his best-known works, as well as his writings on psychedelics (he was a friend of Albert Hoffmann and coined the term "psychonaut"). All his books except for his diaries and correspondences are very short, so you can start anywhere that takes your fancy.

Try reading On Pain by Junger. That’s one of my favorite short-reads of all time. Storm of Steel was the first work of his I’d ever read and I was hooked after that.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats