Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 74
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
What's your score on the Cambridge Face Memory Test? https://www.bbk.ac.uk/psychology/psychologyexperiments/experiments/facememorytest/startup.php
I got just 56% and the difficulty spike between the first and the second parts was insane to me, I went from "I guess I'm not face blind" to "I better not be asked to pick one of the six perps out of a lineup" in a second.
Scored 82%. Kinda gave up at the last stage, got annoyed by the distortions.
More options
Context Copy link
I scored 64. This is such a crazy way to test face blindness. Once it got to the pixelated faces I did not recognize any of the faces. I have done other face blindness tests online in the past which have been a bit easier to me but I scored about the same in relation to the test's "average." I also know that I am significantly more face blind toward women than men: when I am meeting a bunch of new people in a new class, for example, it takes me a really long time to memorize the names of females especially. I do think I am relatively face blind though, recently I made the mistake of introducing myself to someone I had just met 5 minutes prior (granted it was in an overwhelming social situation where I'm usually anxious, but my friend and the person I did this to were both a bit annoyed with me.)
More options
Context Copy link
96%, and I'm actually surprised because in real life I hardly remember the faces of anyone I don't meet frequently (I actually even struggle to pick out prominent public figures often, who I remember far more by their names and policies than I do their faces). In the vast majority of contexts the specific way somebody's face looks is probably the attribute of theirs I care the least about, and I suppose I just don't bother to commit it to long-term memory. In practice I store people as an abstract set of traits and positions in much the same way I do concepts.
More options
Context Copy link
I'll finish it in the morning, felt like I have an unfair advantage - or maybe disadvantage - from having more exposure to British physiognomy. There's one guy who looks exactly like a hybrid of Nick Land and Lord Miles, which got me laughing too hard to keep going.
More options
Context Copy link
I was flying through 'til the end. Somehow ended up with a 93%.
More options
Context Copy link
I was sweating bullets by the end of the Norf FC Identification Quiz.
I got 76% which is remarkable because I feel like I have mild face blindness and was practically guessing for two thirds of the time.
More options
Context Copy link
90% for me. Honestly thought the last part in particular was incredibly difficult, I'm shocked 80% is the average given how hard it seems to be.
More options
Context Copy link
Decided to use nicknames for the faces to improve familiarity, got 90%.
More options
Context Copy link
79%. The last part was ridiculous.
More options
Context Copy link
79%. Got pretty hard there at the end.
More options
Context Copy link
I got 83%, but yeah the spike in difficulty for that last part was unreal. I swear some of those where just pixelated 3D shapes on some gradient where it was all the same face in increasing levels of gaussian noise. Reminds me of looking at diffusion model outputs.
My father has been claiming he's face blind for a year now, time to put this in the family chat and find out how much.
I meant the spike between the first and the second parts. Pick one out of three vs pick one out of six out of three.
Several of the faces have very clear distinct features that were hard to miss for me. The pudgy face was easy to remember, but slightly double chin face? Much harder depending on the angle. The 1st face looks like a co-worker's side profile. Cheekbones guy was very distinct by how sharp his face was. It was the guy with the fat(?)Fuzz(?) right besides his nose that I kept fucking up.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Same results, and I agree. Some of those by the end were just blobs with almost no identifying features.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link