This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Yep. And, counter to the suggestions in other comments about "having siblings gets you into Harvard", invest heavily in support during pregnancy and after the birth up to about four or five years of age. Childcare, but not just childcare: advice for the new parents so they're not left on their own trying to ask Claude "is my baby sick with something serious?", social supports of all kinds, making it feasible for men to take time out to help look after the baby and not have their career nuked, the whole nine yards. Very damn expensive and resource-intensive, but if you want people to have babies, then you need to make it - and I hate to use the phrase, but it fits here - 'it takes a village to raise a child'. Change it so that no, you won't be stuck in the house on your own with a screaming newborn while your husband flees to his job as a refuge, both of you won't be missing out while your child-free friends are having fun and zooming ahead in their careers, you won't be struggling with "okay so we're thinking of having a baby, what should we do now - vitamins? what baby book advice is best? how the hell do we manage this, anyway?" and nowhere to turn.
Because we've chopped away a lot of the previous supports and now new parents are faced with "congrats, here's your baby, now drive home and figure it all out yourself on your own", so why would anyone want to saddle themselves with three kids by the time I'm thirty and I have no life?
Scandinavia does all that(men are actually required to take parental leave).
The highest fertility rates in the EU remain France and Czechia- although outside the EU, the faroes and Georgia have them beat.
You're not required to take parental leave. 90 of the 480 available days of are exclusive to either parent but you don't have to use then if you don't want to, which is something that happens in very unequal earning situations or small business owners.
More options
Context Copy link
For France does that include the European French or is that entirely driven by immigration?
A lot of it is driven by the catholics in France, who have a tfr of some 2.4, are ~40% of the population. Only some 10% of immigrants are Catholic.
More options
Context Copy link
Good question.
There’s certainly pockets of native high fertility in France. But the same is true for holland, Switzerland, etc, which do not have a fertility advantage, so it’s probably not just them- and there’s lots of immigrants in places like Sweden and holland as well.
France’s fertility mix looks similar to other parts of Western Europe- but it has final results in between red and blue states, rather than average for the continent. The precise demographic breakdown can’t be all high-TFR minorities(and France has a few that are native Europeans), because other countries without the TFR advantage have them too. So normie French Europeans have to have some fertility advantage compared to other parts of Europe- but it’s certainly less than, say, conservative Americans or even Afrikaners.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link