Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 231
- 1
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
A true extremely-online person uses the all-comments "firehose" page, so that he never misses out on consooming comments as they are posted.
I think I'd like to meet you in real life.
In-person meetups between people who are not physically attracted to each other are overrated.
My retirement party was two hours long (including 1.5 hours of time theft). This was justifiable. There were something like a dozen people present, and they spent the time eating and discussing their shared job. Even then, I didn't actually enjoy it that much.
My housewarming party with my former coworkers will be four hours long. IMO, this is on the long side, but can be considered justified because (1) the coworkers will discuss their shared job, (2) large amounts of food will be provided, (3) the drive is three or four hours each way (which also implies some staggered arrivals), and (4) substantial amounts of time will be taken up by a house-design contest in which the attendees will discuss the design process with each other. Even then, I don't really expect to enjoy it that much, other than the house-design contest and inviting people to walk with me on the "flat" roof. (I'm holding it not just to show off my cool custom house, but also to show up a coworker who said he was going to hold a housewarming party and then failed to do so.)
In contrast:
A few months ago, I half-jokingly suggested organizing a meetup of people who are interested in nonconsensual editing of print and PDF items into HTML. But a meetup centered on HTML would make far more sense to conduct online: the attendees would share their screens to show off their different approaches. And, even then, what's the point of doing all this rigmarole for an hour of ephemeral screen sharing? The people who would attend can just make individual blogposts on the topic on their personal websites.
Several years ago, I gave serious consideration to asking fellow New Jersey hater @The_Nybbler for an in-person meetup. But what would we actually discuss? Merely hating New Jersey isn't actually substantive enough for a conversation. Even if it is considered substantive enough, it can sustain maybe five minutes of conversation that would be far easier to carry out online (with links to relevant laws). And there's no point in setting up an ephemeral one-on-one conversation when it's much more useful and lasting to just upvote his comments and provide links to relevant laws whenever he expresses hate for New Jersey on this website.
Now you're just teasing.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I used to do that back when I was less gainfully employed. I mean, I was still gainfully employed, I just had more free time.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link