This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Dilbert Creator Scott Adams: ‘I Decided to Pay’ High Price of Free Speech to Have a Conversation About Race
Dilbert is gone...not in some abstract sense , but dropped by syndicate, all papers. That's it..kaput.
First Kanye, and now Scott Adams. 48 hours to destroy your career. Like Kanye he didn't recant and instead doubled down, but at least he still has his twitter account. How many people are going to pay read Dilbert from Scott's personal website? Probably not enough to recover the lost revenue (as he said, he paid a high price). He still has his youtube account, but he's likely on thin ice there. At least he is good friends with Elon Musk, so his Twitter account should be safe. But damn. I feel mixed about this as to if this was a good move on his part ,or what he hopes to get from destroying his career, connections, etc.
sigh I guess I missed my chance to stock up on Dilbert hard copies. I'd grabbed the first few a couple years ago, and then got side tracked. I always had such a fondness for Dilbert in middle school.
God damned this shit keeps happening faster and faster. I need to make a list and commit to stocking up, pronto.
I wish folks (on both the woke and anti-woke sides) would stop using that phrase. No, you weren't trying to have a "conversation" about race. You wanted to preach. I don't think Adams was actually open to argument, any more than the grifters who say we need an "honest conversation" (meaning, sit down in the pews, listen, and shut up) about race.
He has FU money, and will continue collecting royalties for the rest of his life, even if Dilbert isn't as evergreen as Harry Potter.
I suspect that rather like JK Rowling, this wasn't a spontaneous decision, and he knew what the blowback would be.
I want to agree, but we did actually just "have a conversation", and the evident result is that Black people really are now being killed at significantly higher rates than they were before. The strategy that you, I, and most others have settled on is to ignore this fact and hope it goes away on its own, which it is unlikely to do, and which will definately result in many thousands of additional murders over the next decade or two, with all the cascading negative effects for the communities those murders are concentrated in. Judging by past results, this is likely to cause another "conversation" a decade or two from now, that causes the same problem again, and on and on it goes.
Adams is intentionally getting people upset, but the fact is that people should actually be upset, because the reality is upsetting. His actions are not actually a solution, but they are perhaps closer to a solution than anything you or I are willing to act on. Blacks need to take responsibility for their tribe's problems. They need to withdraw active support and solidarity from the portions of their community that have adopted an unrepentant criminal lifestyle, the same way whites have done. They need to support the police that suppress their community's criminals. They pretty clearly aren't going to do any of those things while they can get away with simply blaming racism for all their problems, and they are going to keep blaming racism for all their problems so long as its the only answer we allow as a society.
If the taboo is not broken, there is no hope for change. And of course the first people to break the taboo are those insulated from the consequences; why would we expect anything different?
This is the key. I believe America will only be "post-racial" when we get to the point where, when a chronically disordered individual who happens to be black "fucks about and finds out" with the cops, the majority of black Americans who have jobs and no criminal record shrug and say "play stupid games, win stupid prizes", like I do when the same thing happens to some toothless, tatted up white meth addict. The fact that so many intelligent and educated black Americans continue to feel identification and kinship with thugs and knuckleheads simply because they share a skin color is baffling to me.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link