This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
How many software engineers [or others directly threatened by AI] are not Blue-no-matter-who, though? Those are the people mostly worried about this (and partially because capex on data centers kind of ate the market's appetite for software, though one notes that once those data centers are available there still needs to be software engineers capable of using them)... but from what I can tell most of them (except for perhaps Dallas/Fort Worth) do not vote Red so why cater to them?
If nothing else, Red really needs AI to be too cheap to meter [and very cheap to develop] because control of it (and therefore access) is currently in the hands of
misaligned intelligencestheir political opponents. So their tactic is going to be about maintaining the existing "you want your men in government to make sure that your enemy can't use AI to explode your world" threat and not a more general/civic-responsibility "AI will explode the world" message from Blue (and indeed they are in fact guilty of lying about this- stamping their culture war views into their models, claiming that's "safety", then letting development in the real X-based directions rip). Techno-luddism is kind of a Red stereotype in the first place anyway.The strategy from Blue should arguably be more of what they're already good at: credentialism. You need humans to check that the output is correct, so why not seek some legal protections for that should that change overnight? (That way, even if the highly credentialed [= average Blue voter] are reduced to universal-basic-jobs, it's not going to upend the social order; they'll still be well-paid simply for being the kind of person who is better than average at computers. The fact the Blue side is full of Progressives may significantly degrade their ability to make this point precisely because they were the ones who entangled "safety" with "can't do a wrongthink" in the first place.)
Until it comes time to actually interact with a human being or check its work, of course; if work X isn't done properly and something screws up the superintelligence is still not accountable.
The red can very easily win over decent-enough AI from big tech through a combination of normal corporate bargaining, democrats embracing socialist policies that directly threaten their bottom lines, and of course the stick.
More options
Context Copy link
In my personal experience of having known many of them, most software engineers don't care much about politics and don't pay much attention to it.
More options
Context Copy link
More than there would appear. Many were purged during the height of woke, but most of those ended up somewhere else and hid their power levels better. Some managed to hide their power level the whole time.
More options
Context Copy link
You think I meant job displacement? I meant actual scares. I mean loyal Trumpists going full Alex Jones when they realize the Skynet is coming. It would be pretty easy to scare people into Luddism, to the extent that it overpowers current partisan split (not entirely, of course, but moving it by 10% or so).
The loyal Trumpist position is basically 'we can just pull the plug/flood the datacenters- we don't need to worry about AI alignment because if it stops doing what we tell it to, we'll just hard reboot'. Trumpists going full Alex Jones will target Trump's enemies with ridiculous accusations(because that is what Alex Jones does; this isn't a Why Files type esotericist. He's worried about people), true, but the actual response to Skynet is to turn off the datacenters- the median red triber does not believe a computer can defeat people, for that reason.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link