site banner
PaperclipPerfector  4d ago (text post)   2561 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for November 6, 2026

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

3
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Another "choose the face" website is making rounds on Twitter, this one actually provides some stats, unlike Aella's: https://mytype.fyi/

I learned that my type is so basic it's almost painful. In a nutshell, it's a Mormon or Midwestern college athlete.

I found this exercise confusing, discomforting, and... weirdly insulting, to a point. I ran out of steam a bit past 75 iterations (1.5/12 faces on average, relatively high uniqueness). I began to suspect it was all AI 20 iterations in and was somewhat disappointed to discover on the results screen that judgment was correct.

There were a strangely large number of pictures, particularly white women, that were very obviously men in wigs. I ended up skipping enough full iterations of them that it decided to ask me if I wanted to switch to men (lol wtf?); yet, if I was matching with said men in wigs, it would have never asked me that question.

It did manage to assess my type somewhat correctly (turns out I prefer cute women, but I already knew that), though I believe it overfit some of the categories somewhat due to lack of data- there would be ones I'd pick simply to avoid the 'you don't like crossdressing men or women who are very obviously in their sixties? what are you, gay?' question again, which would be highlighted in the output to a much greater degree than they arguably should be.

Humorously, the system thinks I rate white women worse than any other group despite not ever having selected any of those in the other groups.

There were a strangely large number of pictures, particularly white women, that were very obviously men in wigs.

That's interesting, I never got any of them even after resetting my choices.

The evidence available to me (including what the site claims) suggests that to the majority of men, they appear to be women, and very attractive women at that.

But I assess that whatever they are, it's hammering the 'uncanny valley' instinct incredibly hard (and it can stay as far away from me as possible). The ones with really squared-off/aggressive faces (and square eyebrows) legitimately look like they're trans, and 'if a hominid is bearing its teeth, it's warning you it's about to attack' also applies.

turns out I'm not a fan of "heroin chic" LOL

"Your type: No tattoos, big naturals". Uncanny!

Would be a lot quicker if I could just nix black women, gingers and blondes right from the off.

How does the rarity rating work? I can't understand what "how rare everyone finds each" signifies. What does someone finding a face "1 in 2" and me finding the same face "1 in 400" mean?

I did it the other day, and it told me my type is "Instagram model" (okay, seems kind of underspecified – there are Instagram models from every ethnic background and body type) and "fox face", a term I'd never heard before. Apparently it means a triangular-shaped face with prominent cheekbones, or something? Anyway, when it showed me my type they were almost exclusively Asian women, which certainly checks out, although I'm attracted to women of other ethnicities too.

Ha, both of your types are in my "avoid" pile. My wife's type ("indie film lead") is among my preferred types, but it's crowded out by the large amount of "youthful"+"gym girl"+"clean girl" faces the website has been showing me.

Fun idea, but is their goal really for people to upload pictures of themselves and then to match people who like each other's features? That's never ever going to work, mainly because women don't like 95% of male portraits.

I learned that my type is so basic it's almost painful. In a nutshell, it's a Mormon or Midwestern college athlete.

The interesting thing I learned is not what I like (I already knew, of course), but what I don't like. Apparently, short hair and died hair are absolute deal breakers. Huh. Also, I can't tell white women and middle eastern women apart.

And, apparently, my T levels must be off the chart, literally. I found 15 women per batch attractive, the average man chooses 2 or 3. The chart ends at 12...

It really depends on how you interpret the instructions.

"If I am single and a woman that looks like this starts hitting on me, will I reciprocate?" is one option. "I am at the gynoid factory showroom, shortlisting the faces for my personal assistant and sexbot" is another, and they produce completely different results.

It does seem more fun and to work better than the last round.

women don't like 95% of male portraits.

I wonder if it's a matter of would prefer vs do not like. It's a bit hard to tell with this methodology. But yes, the difference in distribution is quite remarkable.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats