site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   38004 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 27, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Top Bottom New Old Controversial
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This just reads as lazy incumbents wanting to use regulatory capture to catch up and not be disrupted, imo.

I'm not the least bit afraid of GPT4 and seeing the improvement of between 3-4 I'm not afraid of gpt5 either. Gpt6 maybe, who knows, well see how the next iteration turns out.

There will probably be issues at some point in the future but pausing at GPT4 in particular sound like a transparant attempt of getting time to catch up so that Google search etc. isn't disrupted + some general hysterics.

we are already having people doing coding interviews with us and using chat-gpt to generate the solutions

If your coding interviews are passable by chat-gpt then you are doing it a wrong way.

So what?

This just reads as lazy incumbents wanting to use regulatory capture to catch up and not be disrupted, imo.

Big American tech companies falling back on regulatory capture as an excuse for flat out incompetence? Say it ain't so!

Guess they needed all those layoffs; gotta keep the lobbyists on staff and they've got 2 projects that require some anti-competitive behavior this time, so they're definitely billing double time for that one.

Can you be more specific with what projects would require lobbying to fend off the legislators?

Well, OpenAI for one- it uses a lot of scraped material to work as well as it does, but fortunately for them most of the companies that hold copyright on that content are Blue, so making sure their genie has a Blue political agenda is rational to make them feel better lest they get Napster'd. (This is probably why they place so much effort on claiming it's "safe", as in "if you think this is going to change the world we are committed to making sure your political agenda ends up on top" and not "we're taking steps to prevent hostile singularity".)

(Interestingly, OpenAI has a thermonuclear option that I've yet to see anyone mention: if they're shut down, the model has a 100% chance of being leaked. I don't think the companies they're trying to play nice with recognize that the model being a single file is the information equivalent of MAD... and it's not like the destruction of that company is going to end anyone's career if they go down given what they've already proved they can make.)

Bytedance's project, however, can't play both sides against each other. As far as I'm aware, TikTok is politically neutral so it can't stop Blue tech companies from ganging up on them, and they have the China flag and a moral panic for the traditionalist wing to satisfy the Reds. (And they're not wrong- TikTok could be used to support a revolt the Chinese favor; Twitter has been used to start multiple revolts, including in the US in 2020, and I'd be scared of that power too. At least Musk can be physically killed if he lets the Reds do what the Blues did 2 years ago; the Chinese government is comparatively invincible.)

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats