site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1yr ago (text post)   36379 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 10, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

14
Top Bottom New Old Controversial
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm willing to bet we'll reach 30% unemployment in five years. If not sooner. The question becomes - what do we do about it?

30 hour work week like Keynes intended.

30 hours relative to 40 work hours today. But that's 3 people still working 40 and one HR drone or professional emailer working 0 hours.

30% seems entirely too high

Doing what exactly? What possible value does your typical laptop class member have in an AGI world?

Diversity and Equity consultant, Human Resources officer, Climate Change Impact consultant, the list could go on...

I don't know why HR always gets lumped into the list of useless corporate jobs. As someone who owns a one-man law firm, if I were to hire an assistant the first thing they would need to do is essentially act as their own HR department because I wouldn't know where to start when it comes to things like payroll, benefits, onboarding, etc. Now imagine instead of one person it's 500 people and the company needs a consistent policy and procedure when it comes to something like taking FMLA time and it's understandable that you'd need an entire team of people just to handle the constant barrage of questions and requests. This isn't something that you can just hand over to middle management or they'll spend too much time doing shit like that as opposed to what you ostensibly hired them for.

Because if HR were merely doing things like that no one would care. Instead, often they try to start expanded their reach into the actual business.

Often leaving their actual mission behind or understaffed.

This is a great answer, the problem is competition, incentives, and Moloch. If we want this to be a reality we need to immediately start lobbying and building a consensus for a shorter workweek. Something I don’t see happening unfortunately.

It’s a shame most socialist and communist groups have been totally captured by spewing and debating bullshit all day instead of discussing and planning for realistic outcomes like a 30 day workweek in light of AGI. Hopefully they’ll get their collective act together.

30 day work week? That seems rough ;)

Oh yeah, it's brutal. All the 100 hour days....

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats