This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'm libertarian and have a bit of experience fighting losing political battles. I have to say I'm often suspicious of any group that claims to need some form of total victory for any success to be seen. Because they tend to quickly turn towards violence when their victory is not immediate.
There should be intermediate changes in any political plan, here are some reasons why:
You can verify that the underlying belief system is good and useful. If intermediate changes produce obviously bad outcomes then you need to rethink stuff.
Your followers can be happy about something.
Your enemies will see you going slow and they won't all fight as if this is an existential crisis. (some minority will treat it like its existential anyways, politics attracts crazy people)
As it is, that plan is basically going to wind up being "kill my political enemies, and then things will be great".
Of course one can use this as modus tollens.
As you readily admit, incremental change has been the method of losing political battles all this time, which doesn't make it an attractive proposition in the slightest to people who actually care about political goals more than peace.
Hoppe is more realistic than the LP.
More options
Context Copy link
Of course your enemies can figure out the same thing. Gun rights supporters will oppose pretty much any incremental attempt to impinge on gun rights because they know very well that their opponents are following your plan.
You can also look on this as a sort of polluting of the commons: If you disguise an extreme plan by using a series of small changes, you use up people's tolerance for actual small changes.
More options
Context Copy link
I have long shared this suspicion. On the other hand, it sees trivial to find examples in history where the political problems really were so locked-down that revolutionary violence was the only way out. The pre-civil war era in America for one: John Brown and Fort Sumner are examples from both sides of stepping off the brink for lack of an apparent better option. Russia, or any of the big Communist states show the pattern more starkly: once they consolidated power, there really was no fixing things in an incremental fashion.
Incrementalism is to be strictly preferred to revolution, but it requires some minimal level of cooperation to operate. Whether that level of cooperation exists is a really important question.
More options
Context Copy link
I've met quite a few former libertarians in the alt-right.
What's the libertarian plan to create a society where people capable of being libertarian are reproducing?
That plan would work if a guy didn't catch multiple life sentences for having a car accident during a riot.
Before they banned another guy from the internet for making a joke about it.
Before they sent people to jail for months for 'trespassing' in a public building.
Before they shot unarmed protesters.
Before all the rest. Being moderate has been tried and the result is not much different from full-on fedposting.
Or the political enemies can repent. They're not gonna un-sterilize the teenagers, they're not gonna resurrect their dead babies, they're not gonna turn back the slave ships, they're not gonna un-tear the statues and the old buildings and the rest.
But they could stop their current destruction.
All they wanted was to play video games after all.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link