This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I've got an update on the Ken Paxton trial, which is probably going to be a general Texas politics update:
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/06/20/ken-paxton-impeachment-trial-senate-rules/
On the trial:
Angela Paxton, Ken Paxton's wife, is being required to recuse herself. Other than that, the trial rules are generally favorable to Ken Paxton.
The trial begins September 5th. Ken Paxton faces 16 charges, a majority vote can dismiss any of them as groundless and it takes 2/3 to convict. If acquitted he immediately faces trial by the senate on another four charges, but those four are grouped together for whatever reason and the senate can dismiss all four by majority vote.
Governor Greg Abbott has appointed an acting attorney general- his own chief of staff. Most other republican leaders who have commented on the impeachment are opposed, including president Trump.
The majority of Ken Paxton's inner circle from the Texas Attorney General's office has taken a leave of office to help with the trial defense. This is likely part of a move to argue that it's worth overlooking some mild corruption because Paxton is good at his job- and it is demonstrably true that he is very competent.
Dan Patrick, the lieutenant governor of Texas and head of the senate, had this to say about the trial:
This is, uh, a good sign for Ken Paxton.
On other Texas politics news:
Greg Abbott has announced that 1) he intends to call a special session to deliver sweeping school choice and 2) he wants to continue bussing migrants until they stop coming. 1) isn't a surprise to anyone, but 2) is a bit of a change of pace from his previous stance of being interested in carrying out state level deportations but not having the authority to do so without a specific act from the legislature, and marks a shift towards a more permanently-latin-american strategy for dealing with illegal immigration(after all, the fastest way to get them out of your backyard is to bus them to wherever it is they're actually trying to go to).
The Texas house and senate Are Fighting Again, this time over the specifics of how to cut property taxes. The TLDR is that the senate wants to cut taxes immediately, at the cost of possible long term reduction in tax burden, while the house wants the opposite- focus on reducing rates over the long run. Which plan is better for homeowners(their is universal and bipartisan agreement that Texas' property taxes are too high) depends on how much you trust the Texas government to stick to a plan. Greg Abbott claims he will be vetoing random bills until they can come to an agreement, but it's hard not to notice almost all of these bills come from the senate.
The Texas Nationalist Movement has another scheme to get a vote on independence- they're trying to exploit a petition system to get a vote through the primary on holding a referendum. For context, like most fringe groups they're much more popular among the general public than the political elites, although you should treat polling on Texas independence when a democrat occupies the white house with a grain of salt so big it's technically a second moon. They claim to be on track to hit their goal this time, but that could just be actual supporters having an enthusiasm gap even if true.
State efforts to secure the border continue apace, although their real aim is probably to make Greg Abbott look tough. Multiple other states have sent national guardsmen to the border under Texas command and I'm vaguely surprised this isn't the subject of a Desantis ad.
The agreement between the Austin police department and Texas DPS has been renewed again, and APD will be answering directly to the state government instead of the city for the forseeable future. The state government is probably extending this arrangement to Houston, as well, but more slowly.
The Texas independence movement always amused me because of what an utter disaster it would be were it actually implemented. The independence types make a good argument about how Texas has a large economy blah blah blah and could totally stand on its own without help from Uncle Sam. Yeah, probably. But that doesn't happen overnight, especially if if the US doesn't coddle you on the way out. I don't think there would be a war, but when the mail stops being delivered the next day and all the rest of the states Federal employees are laid off as well, things aren't going to look so hot. Texas can talk all it wants about how it's a net contributor of tax revenue but when the Federal funds are cut off it will find itself without a way to capture that excess income; the first order of business for an expressly conservative regime would be to institute sweeping tax increases plus building an enforcement mechanism from scratch. And they'll need that money to build that wall when the Border Patrol up and leaves for Oklahoma and migrants start flooding in unopposed, though after a few months Mexico might start looking like the better option anyway.
Texas has their own tax system.
Many people proclaimed Brexit would be a disaster. It hasn’t so far.
Of course Texas is a lot more integrated into the US compared to the UK and EU. On the other hand, Texas is massive.
Brexit wasn't a disaster, and almost all of the negative consequences that have flowed from it are the result of the EU not negotiating in good faith.
That latter problem, however, is pretty likely in Texit.
Yeah. A lot of texit depends on how accommodating the US government would be. If they went 1861, then it’s ugly. If they worked with texit, then pretty manageable.
Presumably any peaceful Texit would be years in the making so you wouldn’t have a sudden change in status. Federal workers would leave (or find actual jobs).
Or switch to doing the same jobs for the Texas government- presumably it needs a postal service and a border patrol and the like.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
The EU acted just-about as much in good faith as anyone could hope to expect in such a situation, and indeed could have done much worse if some people felt like being particularly ruthless.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link