This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I wonder if the online right intellecto-sphere will ever figure out that Trump wasn't for them.
As I recall, Jack Donovan was never on the Trump train.
Who’s that?
As someone who doesn’t hang out on Twitter, I only really hear about the biggest and/or most mainstream names.
Jack Donovan is a writer and Norse viking LARPer located at a kind of unique intersection of manosphere, white nationalism and the alt right. He wrote a book called the Way of Men and has a few others. He's also an 'androphile', which is totally different to being gay because he's bald and muscular and wears lots of leather and sunglasses, or something. If he sounds a bit ridiculous, he is, but he also seems pretty bright and makes some good points and does that in way fewer words than many other online commentators.
Rob Halford would like to see you in the hall.
Credit where it's due; Donovan has stated that he uses the term androphile mostly as a way to distinguish himself from mainstream 'gay.' It's a cultural distinction which I find fairly common amongst gay men who fall outside of the bi-coast metropolitan social sphere.
I think Donovan fell off because his brand of manly men doing man men things got its doors blown off by the likes of Jocko Wilink and other Professional Veterans who not only tell the same style of stories, but have the personal experience and street cred to back it up.
Yes, that is in fact, the joke - homosexuals already have a fairly significant subculture built around overt masculinity, and Donovan's efforts in that department don't actually make him different. So his insistence that he is Not Like The Other Gays is somewhat feeble. If he gets credit for anything, it's that he seems to have realized this and has retreated from the word, but as another gay man who also doesn't feel comfortable in gay society, I still think it's very funny.
Donovan was never going to have mass appeal - he was too gay, too weird, too unaware of his own silliness, and too politically toxic. That's fine - at the end of the day, he's a fag that managed to turn himself into a man, while Jocko Willink is a warrior that turned himself into a podcaster.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link