site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  4mo ago (text post)   1235 thread views

Transnational Thursday for December 21, 2023

After thirty weeks as @Soriek's passion project, Transnational Thursday is getting added to the auto-post bot. But it hasn't been added to the bot yet, I think, so I'm posting it this week, with apologies to anyone whose plans I've mussed!

Transnational Thursday is a thread for people to discuss international news, foreign policy or international relations history. Feel free as well to drop in with coverage of countries you’re interested in, talk about ongoing dynamics like the wars in Israel or Ukraine, or even just whatever you’re reading.

12
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Egypt & Ethiopia

I’ve covered previously here the ongoing negotiations between Ethiopia and Egypt over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) on the Nile. If it kicks into action it will provide electricity for all of Ethiopia and even allow them to become a net energy exporter. However, Egypt sees it as an existential threat to their already precarious water access (the Nile actually runs south to north, I believe the only major river to do so [edit: not actually so]). Sudan has vacillated between both sides over the years and is currently too burdened with the war to prioritize these negotiations.

Unfortunately, they have now had the final in a series of talks that have stretched over four months, and the two sides have reached no deal (realistically, what middle ground does lie between their positions?) The dam is already producing energy and Ethiopia has said they are going to continue to ramp up energy use with or without Egypt on board. Egypt has said in the past they are willing to take extreme action if this happens, though it’s unclear what is exactly in their power to do. Sudan has previously said that it will not allow Egyptians to move troops overland in Sudan or to fly planes through Sudanese air space to attack Egypt. In fairness Sudan has limited ability to enforce anything at the moment but Egypt is probably not crazy enough to functionally invade their next door neighbor (and essentially ally on this particular issue). It’s unclear as well what the US will do, being allies with both countries and heavily invested in regional stability but also tied up with multiple other conflicts.

For these and other dam negotiations, I'm a bit unclear as to why the impact is so significant.

Isn't it possible for the upstream half of the dam to build up the water necessary to produce electricity, but still provide almost identical downstream flow once this occurs? I understand that the requirement to produce electricity according to demand bumps up against this, and nothing in engineering is as trivial as a layman believes it, but wouldn't it be worth the investment for buffer energy storage to let agriculture and other downstream concerns continue to function?

(the Nile actually runs south to north, I believe the only major river to do so)

St. Lawrence river (the drain of the Great Lakes), plus the Siberian rivers Ob/Yenisei/Lena. All have higher discharge than the Nile.

Thanks, TIL.

I wonder if Egypt might try closing off Ethiopian access to Suez as a countermeasure, they've played that card before in various wars. That's the only non-military hold they have over Ethiopia I can think of. China is Ethiopia's biggest trading partner but they do trade with some European countries, plus the US.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats