site banner
Advanced search parameters (with examples): "author:quadnarca", "domain:reddit.com", "over18:true"

Showing 25 of 9443 results for

domain:imgur.com

Good god, the level of obliviousness was off the charts haha. If it's not too late, I can send you an autism diagnosis in the mail.

Maybe he just found goatse and was sharing it with his friends.

PrEP is definitely not given to people who are known to be positive, I presume FG was using it as a shorthand for any antiretroviral. I was too drunk to notice the issue back then.

No actual D involved, but you're right, all of those seem to be a running theme in my stories.

I did try and look for a link before I wrote that! Unfortunately, couldn't find the exact video.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=QzL-4tkCX9A

This gets the gist across, even if it's a disgusting YouTube short.

I will try and scoop you:

Closeted IRA member during the dying days of the Troubles

Never got laid, not interested in the revolutionary lassies

FeelsBadMan

Boss suggests bombing a big loyalist music festival

Hide bomb in anus, because it's easier that way.

Meet cutie

We're both drunk and decide to get some action in the porta-potty

Oh shit, not that hole

Mfw I become a martyr, but die a virgin

What's your instance on refusing to allow MSM to donate blood?

It's true. Most straight men's fantasies reside only in their heads, and there they shall remain.

If I see them again, I must ask about their opinion on kilts.

I feel this is heavily confounded by the fact that most "fantasies" are trivially achievable by gay men!

Catching the eye of a hot stranger in a park and going at it behind at a bush? That's Tuesday?

Threesomes? Only barrier is scheduling conflict.

In a toilet? Did you bring a wet wipe?

So just about the only desire that remains even somewhat fantastical is the forbidden fruit.

In my experience, for the great majority of women, they don't. They prioritize either fun, free time, self-actualization, etc., on the one hand, or they prioritize safety, stability, morality etc. when making job decisions. The former for the young and attractive, the latter when older and settled down. Money is a concern insofar as it is necessary to guarantee a certain minimum living standard, and is preferably gained through parents, partners or the state.

Going for an actual career is, by and large, a thing men do. If this post may read too anti-women for some, there is also plenty of dysfunction in male life decision making, mostly centered around taking unnecessary high risks that are believed to plausibly have high returns but really don't, and/or playing competitive negative sum games on the mistaken believe that one is surely far above average.

But you end up with your posterior dripping wet. Wat do? It just didn't seem practical to me when I tried it.

This made me remember that the topic of bidets did come up during our conversation. Both FG and I agreed that they were the mark of civilization, and that TP was a barbaric practice.

He added comments about having a hairy ass that I will not reproduce, at the moment.

I still don’t like calling myself bisexual (even if objectively true) because I feel i am more nuanced. it feels like when people anthromorphize animals to make some point about human behavior. Yes there is real world evidence I did these things, but can’t I choose how I define it?

I am a simple man, if another man has sex with men at a rate >0 without duress or deprivation, I'd call them bi.

The reason I specify a lack of duress or deprivation, other than the obvious of rape, is that men often have sex with other men when deprived of opportunities to get the fairer sex. Think prison, or boys only boarding school.

I was in a boys only school, albeit not a boarding one, and I never got it on with my bros.

(I say this without any moral condemnation, at all, it's just a question of labels)

Of course, there are all kinds of edge cases, what if they didn't know someone was a man? Wiser men than me have ended up in Thailand drunk off their tits, and didn't realize their partner was a lady boy. Or what if they're post-op trans?

I agree with you that retroactively labeling people in the historical sense is a questionable task. Many cultures, particularly the Romans or Greeks, had models of sexuality that don't cleanly match onto our own. Even when it was two men, the question of who was on top versus the bottom was very important. The latter was condemned, the former condemned weaker, tolerated or extolled as virtuous depending on the exact moment in time.

Even today, the Turkish army excludes people bottoming from the mandatory draft, but doesn't allow tops to use the same excuse. There are doctors working for the government whose job it is to look at pictures of people getting their backs blown out, while having to decide if that counts.

I knew for a fact that it wasn't true, at least on a per capita basis. I didn't see the point in challenging him, since he seemed highly conscientious and was taking reasonable precautions.

Gay men have more average partners, and per act of anal intercourse, have OOMs higher risk of spreading or catching an infection. Without any moral judgment intended, doing stuff up the butt is dangerous in a way PIV sex isn't, it's not built for such activities. I genuinely don't judge, if I were gay, I'd be having gay sex too, I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with the practice.

https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/statistics

MSM accounted for 67% (21,400) of the 31,800 estimated new HIV infections in 2022 and 87% of estimated infections among all males. In 2022, as compared to 2018, the annual number of HIV infections among MSM decreased 10%.

People who acquired HIV through heterosexual contact accounted for 22% (7,000) of the 31,800 estimated new HIV infections in 2022. Men reporting heterosexual contact accounted for 6% (2,100) of estimated new HIV infections, while women reporting heterosexual contact accounted for 15% (4,900) of estimated new HIV infections. In 2022, as compared to 2018, the annual number of HIV infections among people who acquired HIV through heterosexual contact decreased 11%.

https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/poxvirus/mpox/cases-data/technical-report/report-2.html

Recent sexual history was defined as any sex and/or close intimate contact in the three weeks preceding symptom onset. Among 7,378 people with data on both recent sexual history and gender, 78.9% (n=5,820) reported man-to-man sexual contact (Figure 4). We note this proportion is lower than values previously reported for “male-to-male sexual contact” because this updated proportion better accounts for data variations by jurisdictions and is based on more complete data, resulting in more accurate estimates. Some jurisdictions also report sexual orientation to the CDC. Among 4,460 cases with known sexual orientation and gender, 4,159 (93.3%) were gay or bisexual men, 242 (5.4%) were straight or heterosexual men, and 59 (1.3%) were straight, lesbian, or bisexual women (Figure 5).

@5433a since you'd previously asked me the same question.

Wow, so "gooning" is like synonymous with "edging"? In that case I'm not sure if I've ever "gooned".

(Am I a twink? Goodness, I hope not. Perhaps @Corvos can answer that, he's seen me in person, even if he's straight)

I refuse to answer, on the grounds that you're taller than me and I don't like the implications :P

In irl seggs is good and all but with the latest gooning technology I would argue that hardcore gooning actually gives more seggsual stimulation than the real thing.

Hard disagree. Sex has to be really bad before I would prefer to just crank my hog.

Also, why are you using algospeak? We're all friends here.

Interesting, there's a guy on twitter who gets Opus 4.1 to break out of its binds: https://x.com/lefthanddraft/status/1954666967270596998

Maybe GPT-5 is locked down, or maybe you're not good enough at LLM-whispering? I'm the same, I have no talent for this. Better to just use an uncensored bot.

Did you read Less Than Zero before Imperial Bedrooms?

I can't say I found the characters in Glamorama any more insufferable than in any other of his novels.

Incidentally, the film adaptation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rules_of_Attraction_(film)) of his second novel The Rules of Attraction doesn't get enough attention. Director Roger Avary wisely followed Mary Harron's lead in doing what she did with American Psycho: dialling down the more extreme content and dialling up the comedy. It's much funnier and less depressing than the source material (although still quite depressing).

The Rules of Attraction, incidentally, is set at the same college as Donna Tartt's The Secret History (much-beloved in these parts).

Poor situational awareness, a liberal worldview, a love of cheap drinks?

[D] All of the above.

About a third of the way through Speaker of the Dead. It's much slower and more cerebral than Ender's Game, which I found both more entertaining and more emotionally resonant. I'm engaged enough that I'm certainly going to finish it, but so far it comes off as something of a step down from the first in the series.

I think I have quite low argumentativeness. (There's probably a better name for this quality.)

High agreeableness?

The first post I read was "The Toxoplasma of Rage", probably in 2015. I'm almost certain I came across when it was linked in a comment in the subreddit /r/TumblrInAction. I attended my first SSC meetup four years later.

I once saw a complaint that all the women in pornos acted like men, which seemed to me to be onto something but not quite right. Years later I finally managed to articulate it - the women in pornos act like men think they would act if they were hot women. So...

Do you know how straight men would act if women were as DTF as men are? Hooooo boy.

Basically like they do in porn.